Tiny elapsed/run times
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Tiny elapsed/run times

Author Message
Luigi R.
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 18
Posts: 21
Credit: 35,671,759
RAC: 0
Message 5632 - Posted: 23 Jan 2020, 12:52:46 UTC
Last modified: 23 Jan 2020, 12:54:06 UTC

First of all, I'm not restarting BOINC.

Some WUs have correct elapsed time and tiny run time.
E.g. R510_200-250k_wu_2872_1
I guess there is nothing wrong here.

Some WUs have tiny elapsed time and tiny run time.
E.g. S177_retest2_wu_119_4
3.04 seconds elapsed, 0.09s seconds run.
3 invalid tasks before mine that is valid.
Is this ok?

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7255
Credit: 42,729,227
RAC: 4
Message 5633 - Posted: 23 Jan 2020, 14:36:43 UTC - in response to Message 5632.
Last modified: 23 Jan 2020, 16:06:51 UTC

First of all, I'm not restarting BOINC.

Some WUs have correct elapsed time and tiny run time.
E.g. R510_200-250k_wu_2872_1
I guess there is nothing wrong here.

Some WUs have tiny elapsed time and tiny run time.
E.g. S177_retest2_wu_119_4
3.04 seconds elapsed, 0.09s seconds run.
3 invalid tasks before mine that is valid.
Is this ok?


There is a wrong number in the input file:
1074*171^393615+1
S177_retest2_wu_

I will check that later why. Your result is valid because you have no output to check for validator. Thx for reporting.

Update:
The header was wrong in the input file. I will reupload all again.


Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Tiny elapsed/run times


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2014-2024 BOINC Confederation / rebirther