Strange runtimes for S712
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Strange runtimes for S712

Author Message
Profile Adrian Schori
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Jan 15
Posts: 8
Credit: 24,577,779
RAC: 11,086
Message 870 - Posted: 9 Feb 2015, 7:09:20 UTC

The runtimes for these workunits are only 3 sec and cpu time about 0.6 sec on my imac. The result is marked successful and I get credit. But I guess, there's something wrong. I stopped crunching them. Riesel Base short and Sierpinski Base short are running fine.

http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=6688553
____________

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3784
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 0
Message 871 - Posted: 9 Feb 2015, 9:01:25 UTC - in response to Message 870.
Last modified: 9 Feb 2015, 9:01:37 UTC

The runtimes for these workunits are only 3 sec and cpu time about 0.6 sec on my imac. The result is marked successful and I get credit. But I guess, there's something wrong. I stopped crunching them. Riesel Base short and Sierpinski Base short are running fine.

http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=6688553


Thats bad. I found some empty input files created in the first 50-60k serie but should be marked as invalid because of Missing header file message in log which you dont have. I need to check the results later today.

Profile Tarmo Ilves
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 15
Posts: 5
Credit: 1,637,306
RAC: 0
Message 874 - Posted: 9 Feb 2015, 13:02:29 UTC

My macbook pro produces same crap!
____________


Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Strange runtimes for S712


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2014-2018 BOINC Confederation / rebirther