log in |
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
High priority and multithreading - client ignoring number of CPU cores
(Message 5190)
Posted 12 May 2019 by [SG]Felix this is a general boinc problem, which doesn't only show up here at srbase. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long 2 are a joke
(Message 5169)
Posted 4 May 2019 by [SG]Felix
the linked one is mine, it should work. maybe it isn't in the right directory |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long 2 are a joke
(Message 5127)
Posted 20 Apr 2019 by [SG]Felix
it works the same way as it works at Primegrid with -t8 my i7-5820k needs about 11-12 hours for one task |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bit of disaster, need advise
(Message 5123)
Posted 20 Apr 2019 by [SG]Felix let the first one run, the pause it manually for a short time, that the second can run. then press right click onone of the tasks, then press, i think in english it is properties, and look in which slot the task is. open the folder of this slot and look what progress your stderr.txt file says at the bottom. this is the progress from which the task (should) restart |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No checkpoints for long3
(Message 5029)
Posted 14 Mar 2019 by [SG]Felix copy a snipped of the stderr.txt and post it here. ich machs kurz auf deutsch... wenn du den link anklickst bekommst du den ganzen stderr alles eig in ordnung, aber lange zeiten und manchmal neu gestartet aber nicht bis zum checkpoint gekommen |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No checkpoints for long3
(Message 5009)
Posted 4 Mar 2019 by [SG]Felix you cant do anything, its a thin in the code of this wrapper from srbase i think |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No checkpoints for long3
(Message 4991)
Posted 25 Feb 2019 by [SG]Felix long 3 is checkpointing, i am running those and looked up for you edit: my mew wu: 20:04:32 (26308): wrapper (7.5.26012): starting 20:04:32 (26308): wrapper: running llr.exe ( -d -oPgenInputFile=input.prp -oPgenOutputFile=primes.txt -oDiskWriteTime=10 -oOutputIterations=50000 -oResultsFileIterations=99999999 -t9) Base factorized as : 2*3 Base prime factor(s) taken : 3 Starting N-1 prime test of 168610*6^3344880+1 Using all-complex FMA3 FFT length 960K, Pass1=384, Pass2=2560, 9 threads, a = 3 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 50000 / 8646405 [0.57%]. Time per bit: 1.453 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 100000 / 8646405 [1.15%]. Time per bit: 0.894 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 150000 / 8646405 [1.73%]. Time per bit: 0.894 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 200000 / 8646405 [2.31%]. Time per bit: 0.893 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 250000 / 8646405 [2.89%]. Time per bit: 0.886 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 300000 / 8646405 [3.46%]. Time per bit: 0.884 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 350000 / 8646405 [4.04%]. Time per bit: 0.891 ms. 168610*6^3344880+1, bit: 400000 / 8646405 [4.62%]. Time per bit: 0.886 ms. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 4946)
Posted 15 Feb 2019 by [SG]Felix okay, thanks |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 4941)
Posted 15 Feb 2019 by [SG]Felix could you load a bigger base with more wus? |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long 2 are a joke
(Message 4855)
Posted 3 Jan 2019 by [SG]Felix for long3 i have runtimes of under 2 hours. note that the shown runtimes aren't correct, because boinc has problems when you load 9 wus and only compute one after the other. once i have wus which i got alone without other wus, the runtimes are correct. right time is the time in seconds shown at the bottom of the stderr out heres my app-config.xml for an i7-5820k: <app_config> <app_version> <app_name>srbase</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase2</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase3</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase4</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase5</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase6</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase7</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase8</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase9</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase10</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase11</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>srbase12</app_name> <cmdline>-t9</cmdline> <avg_ncpus>9</avg_ncpus> </app_version> </app_config> last result for long3 here |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 4853)
Posted 3 Jan 2019 by [SG]Felix Crus published the new 2019 project goals, i think we can expect a bunch of new work |
12)
Message boards :
News :
SRBase - 4 years review
(Message 4802)
Posted 7 Dec 2018 by [SG]Felix looking at the recommended base list, we can see nearly everything has as status reservated.what have you planned to run untill the new goals for 2019 are listed? |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long 2 are a joke
(Message 4760)
Posted 19 Nov 2018 by [SG]Felix use app_config.xml to say boinc, that llr should use multiple cores for one task |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long 2 are a joke
(Message 4758)
Posted 19 Nov 2018 by [SG]Felix just use mt, it helps to get them back within the deadline |
15)
Message boards :
News :
SRBase - 4 years review
(Message 4752)
Posted 18 Nov 2018 by [SG]Felix The project has passed the fourth year. 4 more years to finish the project? ;) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 4715)
Posted 28 Oct 2018 by [SG]Felix winter comes, we have to heat the houses |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 4713)
Posted 28 Oct 2018 by [SG]Felix we will see ^^. yes there is a big ammount of work now, thank you. |
18)
Message boards :
News :
Looking for a compiler
(Message 4703)
Posted 27 Oct 2018 by [SG]Felix well sorry but he actually doesn't know anything about open cl |
19)
Message boards :
News :
Looking for a compiler
(Message 4701)
Posted 26 Oct 2018 by [SG]Felix i can ask my fahter this evening, but he does normaly C++ stuff, i don't know if he can do open cl |
20)
Message boards :
News :
Looking for a compiler
(Message 4699)
Posted 26 Oct 2018 by [SG]Felix are here some news? |