| log in |
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10848)
Posted 12 days ago by Speedy51 Appreciate the confirmation. I do not recall credit dropping by 1200 previously when changing to a high bit level less credit, less runtime. I completely understand. I cannot recall credit dropping 1200 in the space of 2 bit levels. Out of complete curiosity what was the time difference between the last 300 bit level task and the 1st 400 bit level task on your RX5500XT? Runtime difference between 75-76_360-392M & 75-76_397-403M on my RTX 4090 (limited to 350W) is 11 seconds. It works out to be 109.09 credits per second, for those interested |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10844)
Posted 12 days ago by Speedy51 Appreciate the confirmation. I do not recall credit dropping by 1200 previously when changing to a high bit level less credit, less runtime. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10841)
Posted 12 days ago by Speedy51 we are nearly at 400k range. We have reached the 400K range. https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?result_name=TF_75-76_397-403M_wu_1750_0+ takes 2 minutes 27 seconds. Query, Seems a big drop in credit it's a drop of 1,200 Credits now 10,500? |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10812)
Posted 25 days ago by Speedy51 75-76_360-392M taking 2 minutes 38 seconds 11,700 credits |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10787)
Posted 10 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 Thank you, my maths is on point in regards to task numbers |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10785)
Posted 10 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 Thanks, I am unsure what to do with this information, in relation to the question I asked |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10783)
Posted 10 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 So I am able to have a rough idea of tracking progress by looking at the 5 numbers at the end of the task. Taking 75-76_293-387M_wu_29659 is it reasonable for me to work out the progress with task number "29659" that we are 29.65% of the way through 293 – 387M range? For those interested my 4090 at 320W took 2 minutes 35 seconds to complete task |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10780)
Posted 9 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 No it's not too small. I was simply curious My 4090 takes around 3 hours 26 minutes/2 minutes 36 seconds a task to complete 80 tasks, bearing in mind it is limited to 350W. If it's going to take 1 to 2 years to complete the millions of tests remaining they could get too quick for my GPU. That's not a bad thing I guess Thanks for the details |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10778)
Posted 9 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 Thank you. I must've been unlucky to receive almost a full cache around 75 tasks that ran for a touch over 3 minutes. I know we are not halfway through the current bit level yet, is it too early to ask whether we will be processing another bit level when this one is completed? |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10776)
Posted 9 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 Things have returned to normal tasks that are giving 11,700 credits are taking 2 minutes 37 seconds and they have dropped to just over 20 GHz days https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=25456175 Meant to ask in my original post has the number of tasks per bit level changed I seem to recall there were 100,000 work units before the range would change. How is this changed to close to 200,000? |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10775)
Posted 8 Jun 2025 by Speedy51 This post is slightly different to my normal ones in this thread. The two tasks below that I have also included the link for at the top of the writing I also ran manually I noticed for the bottom task that last number is 257-387M I believe should run faster than the top one since it is lower credit. However it is actually 3.66 GHz days more than the top one. Is there a particular reason why my bottom task has a longer runtime? I am now using a 4090 limited to 320W https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=26057509 gave 12,000 credit for 2 minutes 36 seconds (runtime) got assignment: exp=376317883 bit_min=75 bit_max=76 (20.33 GHz-days) Starting trial factoring M376317883 from 2^75 to 2^76 (20.33 GHz-days) k_min = 50195504343600 k_max = 100391008691333 Using GPU kernel "barrett76_mul32_gs" Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Jun 09 10:19 | 4617 100.0% | 0.159 n.a. | 11509.87 82485 n.a.% no factor for M376317883 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.23.0 barrett76_mul32_gs] tf(): total time spent: 2m 33.168s https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=25451631 gave 11,700 credits for 3 minutes 2 seconds (runtime) got assignment: exp=318912029 bit_min=75 bit_max=76 (23.99 GHz-days) Starting trial factoring M318912029 from 2^75 to 2^76 (23.99 GHz-days) k_min = 59230960930680 k_max = 118461921870489 Using GPU kernel "barrett76_mul32_gs" Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Jun 09 10:22 | 4615 100.0% | 0.188 n.a. | 11486.65 82485 n.a.% no factor for M318912029 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.23.0 barrett76_mul32_gs] tf(): total time spent: 3m 0.423s |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10626)
Posted 19 Apr 2025 by Speedy51 75-76_253-297M taking 4 minutes 19 seconds 14,000 credits |
|
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10525)
Posted 16 Mar 2025 by Speedy51 75-76_272-277M taking 4 minutes 38 seconds 17,000 credits |
|
14)
Message boards :
News :
Trial Factoring 75-76bit range started
(Message 10510)
Posted 10 Mar 2025 by Speedy51 Good as gold, thanks for the feedback. |
|
15)
Message boards :
News :
Trial Factoring 75-76bit range started
(Message 10508)
Posted 10 Mar 2025 by Speedy51 I am aware this is an old topic Out of curiosity are we going to be in the 75 – 76bit range for the foreseeable future or will we be moving back to a lower range e.g. 74 – 75bit once the current 75 – 76bit range is completed? |
|
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10507)
Posted 7 Mar 2025 by Speedy51 75-76_187-272M taking 4 minutes 48 seconds 17,000 credits |
|
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TF credit change
(Message 10443)
Posted 17 Jan 2025 by Speedy51 75-76_181-246M taking 5 minutes 15 seconds 17,000 credits |
|
18)
Message boards :
News :
new TF app testing started
(Message 10441)
Posted 16 Jan 2025 by Speedy51 Completely from a curiosity point may I ask what M range the test work was from? |
|
19)
Message boards :
News :
new TF app testing started
(Message 10428)
Posted 16 Jan 2025 by Speedy51 Before 20 have finished, the rest gets aborted due to not having been started in time. This also happened to me when I first started processing the new work all my work completed in time. As long as you are/completing returning successful work I would ask for work again as your machine theoretically shouldn't ask for as many meaning you should be able to get through them before the deadline has passed. I am unable to look at your hardware as your hosts are "hidden" |
|
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available??
(Message 10369)
Posted 9 Jan 2025 by Speedy51 Hey Rebirther, when will you get some TF tasks for us to crunch again? 84,096 remaining to be completed |