log in |
41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5874)
Posted 27 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer Nvidia on Linux I'll upgrade the system to Ubuntu 19.10 and install the latest Nvidia, OpenCL and CUDA files |
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5871)
Posted 27 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer That's not something I can choose, it is an error that the code comes up with Error comes up using various AMD APUs (Athlon 5350 Radeon R3, Athlon A12-9800E Radeon R7) |
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5868)
Posted 27 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer Nvidia on Linux <message> process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message> <stderr_txt> 22:54:06 (28652): wrapper (7.2.26012): starting 22:54:06 (28652): wrapper: running ./mfaktc.exe ( --device 0) ./mfaktc.exe: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.10.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 22:54:07 (28652): ./mfaktc.exe exited; CPU time 0.001267 22:54:07 (28652): app exit status: 0x7f00 22:54:07 (28652): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> This code tries running an .exe on Linux! Can be done under WINE (emulator), but not native. |
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5865)
Posted 27 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer That's not something I can choose, it is an error that the code comes up with |
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5863)
Posted 27 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer GPU72, using AMD under Linux: <stderr_txt> 17:36:52 (786): wrapper (7.2.26012): starting 17:36:52 (786): wrapper: running mfakto-x64 ( --device 0) ERROR: unknown option '--device' 17:36:53 (786): mfakto-x64 exited; CPU time 0.000165 17:36:53 (786): app exit status: 0x100 17:36:53 (786): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> |
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5853)
Posted 24 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer no, not anymore, if I enable on server side you will see an option for this. I just checked again, but it still shows what I pasted a few minutes ago |
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5851)
Posted 24 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer I think that is, in the prefs No, GPU72 can be chosen, and you can choose to have other than the preferred apps when there is none of those you checked. The is NO option to run test apps.
Resource share 10000
Use CPU
Use ATI GPU
Use NVIDIA GPU
Wil je dat SRBase en/of je team e-mail naar je kunnen verzenden?
Wil je dat SRBase jouw computers laat zien op de website?
Standaard computer locatie ---
Maximum CPU gebruik voor grafische weergave
0 ... 100 1
Alleen geselecteerde applicaties uitvoeren Sierpinski / Riesel Base: ja
Riesel Base: ja
Sierpinski Base: ja
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short: ja
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long: nee
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average: ja
Riesel Base - short: ja
Sierpinski Base - short: ja
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average2: ja
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average3: ja
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long2: nee
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long3: nee
GPU72: ja
Andere applicaties accepteren als er geen werk voor de geselecteerde applicaties is? no
Voorkeuren bijwerken
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5846)
Posted 23 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer How can I get those tasks? That is NOT a setting on the account page |
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Trial Factoring
(Message 5845)
Posted 23 Mar 2020 by Dirk Broer Same for Linux/NV. Trying to have an *.exe running under Linux? Are you even serious? |
50)
Message boards :
News :
server and db crash
(Message 5733)
Posted 29 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer Everything on the server status page shows Ubuntu as the OS, why is there a Windows point of failure at all? Windows 10, is it a LTS build? I don't like running Win10 on my desktop, but I also play games that will not run on Linux. Could you do it the other way around, make Windows the guest of the Ubuntu system? |
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5716)
Posted 25 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer should now be corrected, sorry! see my sub-project sores and look for the -307,220... |
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5715)
Posted 25 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer Three of my sub-projects have been restored, one has gotten a new total inbetween the old and new value, one remained unchanged, three have not been restored: Unfortunately, not. This is the present state:
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit 1,895,530 more off than ever
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit 1,535,920 unchanged
Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit 1,234,516 restored
Sierpinski Base credit 1,132,878 new total due to new work
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit 1,106,835 restored
Riesel Base credit 1,002,388 restored
Sierpinski Base - short credit 956,183 restored
Riesel Base - short credit 672,335 not restored
|
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5711)
Posted 23 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer Three of my sub-projects have been restored, one has gotten a new total inbetween the old and new value, one remained unchanged, three have not been restored: SubProject Credit-oldCredit-new
SRBase Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average 2,217,980 2,198,390
SRBase Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long 1,535,920 1,535,920
SRBase Sierpinski / Riesel Base 1,234,516 1,222,096
SRBase Sierpinski Base 1,131,838 1,130,678
SRBase Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short 1,106,835 1,096,975
SRBase Riesel Base 1,002,388 999,748
SRBase Sierpinski Base - short 956,183 949,673
SRBase Riesel Base - short 678,815 672,335
credit now:
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit 2,198,390 not restored
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit 1,535,920 unchanged
Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit 1,234,516 restored
Sierpinski Base credit 1,131,758 new total
Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit 1,106,835 restored
Riesel Base credit 1,002,388 restored
Sierpinski Base - short credit 949,673 not restored
Riesel Base - short credit 672,335 not restored
|
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5682)
Posted 22 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer Thanks for all the good work, rebirther! |
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5666)
Posted 22 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer I would hope Bok at Free-DC would be able to give you the delta values from the last good stats to what was lost. The total scores that you corrected are given in user.gz, the sub-project scores that hopefully can be corrected too are given in user_work.gz. Bok of FreeDC has the data you need, I hope. He can show today what you lost yesterday per subproject on your usersubprojects page. |
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5653)
Posted 22 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer I would hope Bok at Free-DC would be able to give you the delta values from the last good stats to what was lost. Any chance of getting the lost SRBase data restored too? And please note that our subproject credits are still not re-adjusted, hopefully Bok has those too. |
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Sudden credit loss
(Message 5641)
Posted 21 Feb 2020 by Dirk Broer My credit went down some 60k in one manual update, from 9,864,194 to 9,805,814 ? |
58)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Raspberry Pi
(Message 2496)
Posted 18 Apr 2016 by Dirk Broer RaspberryPi has this http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0301h/index.html (section 1.5.9) In the meantime the Raspberry Pi 2 has come out, using an ARM Cortex-A7 with ARMv7 architecture/instruction set and that has been followed by the Raspberry Pi 3, using an ARM Cortex-A53 with ARMv8 architecture/instruction set. Biggest problem for the Raspberry as a crunching platform is the small amount of RAM: 1 GB. |
59)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Feeder not running
(Message 2330)
Posted 2 Feb 2016 by Dirk Broer 3-2-2016 00:37:47 | SRBase | update requested by user 3-2-2016 00:37:51 | SRBase | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 3-2-2016 00:37:52 | SRBase | Scheduler request completed 3-2-2016 00:37:52 | SRBase | Server error: feeder not running |
60)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Too long calculation for the Sierpinski/Riesel Bases - long
(Message 1641)
Posted 9 Jul 2015 by Dirk Broer Ever watched in the debugger whether an AMD CPU actually uses the AVX part of the code? the Intel compiler-made Assembly seeks a when running on a non-Intel CPU. Well, Mr. Frankhagen, just for you: the same Motherboard (ASUS AM1I-A), SOC (AMD Athlon 5350) and amount of memory (16GB), plain install of OS and BOINC, nothing further: Under Windows 10 Under Linux Look especially at the given integer performance.... How do you explain that, other than with AMD systems being artificially crippled by compilers and/or libraries favouring Intel? An Intel CPU or SOC does no give this dramatical differences -in fact almost none at all. |