| Author | 
Message | 
        
        
        
        
       rebirtherVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist
   Send message
 Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8007 Credit: 46,538,964 RAC: 0
                         | 
        
        
        
    ... 
Did they run to 100% or have they been finished earlier? 
...  
I can answer it myself now, they end somewhere between 95.5% and 95.8% - I finished all 6 before a second one had been sent out and it gave my RAC temporarily a nice boost :-)
  
 
You can easily check the line in stderr.txt in slot directory, find this line: 
 
8*800^914450-1, bit: 50000 / 8818828 [0.56%].  Time per bit: 34.238 ms. 
 
Calculate 8818828 * 34.238 ms / 1000 
 
and you have a nearly good end result in runtime. This can only be used on windows hosts. | 
|
 | 
        
        | 
        
         | 
        
        
        | 
     Thanks, I will use that formula next time to fight my (not the core client's) deadline panic :-)  | 
|
 | 
        
        | 
        
         | 
        
        
        
    ... 
You can easily check the line in stderr.txt in slot directory, find this line: 
 
8*800^914450-1, bit: 50000 / 8818828 [0.56%].  Time per bit: 34.238 ms. 
...  
The last stderr line seems to be even more interesting (taken from an active run) : 
 
8*800^951038-1, bit: 8250000 / 9171677 [89.95%].  Time per bit: 34.432 ms.  
BoincView shows only somewhat more than 60.5% (in yellow, my color setting for "will miss deadline") 
 
p.s.: If the wrapper could read that value, it could report that one to the core client. That's how the RNA wrapper does it - unfortunately the RNA applications don't have such a linear loop characteristic so the values are still not too exact there. Even though I do know the expected numbers of loops exactly, the progress line is not straight.
  | 
|
 | 
        
        | 
        
         | 
        
        
        
    ...8*800^951038-1, bit: 8250000 / 9171677 [89.95%].  Time per bit: 34.432 ms. ...   
It is getting harder to keep the deadline ... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 50000 / 9391576 [0.53%].  Time per bit: 41.762 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 100000 / 9391576 [1.06%].  Time per bit: 40.380 ms. 
... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3250000 / 9391576 [34.60%].  Time per bit: 40.744 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3300000 / 9391576 [35.13%].  Time per bit: 147.026 ms. <= oops! 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3350000 / 9391576 [35.67%].  Time per bit: 40.288 ms. 
... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 7100000 / 9391576 [75.59%].  Time per bit: 41.622 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 7150000 / 9391576 [76.13%].  Time per bit: 41.693 ms. 
 same computer, 20% longer processing time/bit  | 
|
 | 
        
        
        
        
       rebirtherVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist
   Send message
 Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8007 Credit: 46,538,964 RAC: 0
                         | 
        
        
        
    ...8*800^951038-1, bit: 8250000 / 9171677 [89.95%].  Time per bit: 34.432 ms. ...   
It is getting harder to keep the deadline ... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 50000 / 9391576 [0.53%].  Time per bit: 41.762 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 100000 / 9391576 [1.06%].  Time per bit: 40.380 ms. 
... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3250000 / 9391576 [34.60%].  Time per bit: 40.744 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3300000 / 9391576 [35.13%].  Time per bit: 147.026 ms. <= oops! 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 3350000 / 9391576 [35.67%].  Time per bit: 40.288 ms. 
... 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 7100000 / 9391576 [75.59%].  Time per bit: 41.622 ms. 
8*800^973840-1, bit: 7150000 / 9391576 [76.13%].  Time per bit: 41.693 ms. 
 same computer, 20% longer processing time/bit 
  
 
Its better to disable HT. --> runtime ~392210s | 
|
 | 
        
        | 
        
         | 
        
        
        
    ... 
Its better to disable HT. --> runtime ~392210s  
But only 8 concurrent tasks then instead of 16, overall that would be a loss. 
 
I guess I need an AVX machine some day :-/ | 
|
 | 
        
        
        
        
       rebirtherVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist
   Send message
 Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8007 Credit: 46,538,964 RAC: 0
                         | 
        
        
        
    ... 
Its better to disable HT. --> runtime ~392210s  
But only 8 concurrent tasks then instead of 16, overall that would be a loss. 
 
I guess I need an AVX machine some day :-/
  
 
Yes, I have a good CPU but only AVX + OC, AVX2 is 20-40% faster with no OC :( | 
|
 | 
        
        | 
        
         | 
        
        
        | 
     Name	R800_900k-1M_wu_1843_4 
Workunit	95082944 
Created	15 Jan 2016, 2:29:37 UTC 
Sent	15 Jan 2016, 4:34:43 UTC 
Report deadline	19 Jan 2016, 4:34:43 UTC 
Received	19 Jan 2016, 10:10:05 UTC 
Server state	Over 
Outcome	Success 
Client state	Done 
Exit status	0 (0x0) 
Computer ID	1238 
Run time	2 days 16 hours 9 min 25 sec 
CPU time	2 days 11 hours 37 min 4 sec 
Validate state	Task was reported too late to validate 
Credit	0.00 
Device peak FLOPS	2.34 GFLOPS 
Application version	Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long v0.05 
 
Ish :-(  | 
|
 | 
        
        
        
        
       rebirtherVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist
   Send message
 Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8007 Credit: 46,538,964 RAC: 0
                         | 
        
        
        
    Name	R800_900k-1M_wu_1843_4 
Workunit	95082944 
Created	15 Jan 2016, 2:29:37 UTC 
Sent	15 Jan 2016, 4:34:43 UTC 
Report deadline	19 Jan 2016, 4:34:43 UTC 
Received	19 Jan 2016, 10:10:05 UTC 
Server state	Over 
Outcome	Success 
Client state	Done 
Exit status	0 (0x0) 
Computer ID	1238 
Run time	2 days 16 hours 9 min 25 sec 
CPU time	2 days 11 hours 37 min 4 sec 
Validate state	Task was reported too late to validate 
Credit	0.00 
Device peak FLOPS	2.34 GFLOPS 
Application version	Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long v0.05 
 
Ish :-(  
 
You have a 4 day deadline + as long as the second result came back you have a valid result too. | 
|
 |