log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Bestätigungsfehler...?
Author | Message |
---|---|
confirmation bias | |
ID: 5513 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
The validator is checking for some keywords, in this case "error" and a bad residue causing the WU invalid. | |
ID: 5514 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
hmmm? | |
ID: 5515 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Check this also: | |
ID: 5516 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ich habe den Widows Defender als Anti Virus Software drauf die blockiert dies nicht- | |
ID: 5517 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ich habe den Widows Defender als Anti Virus Software drauf die blockiert dies nicht- dann liegts am OC, llr ist da etwas empfindlich | |
ID: 5518 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
hmmm? Max safe operating temp for that CPU is 62C. So you need to run it cooler. https://safetemp.blogspot.com/2015/12/amd-fx-series-fx-8350-max-temp.html My 1090T also would run at 65C and pass AMD Overdrive stress test for an hour but then it would fail SRBase WU's at high rates and this project forced me to redo my 1090T's overclock. SRBase WUs run the CPU hotter than most all other BOINC WU's I've tested and push the CPU thermal limits. So try to run at slightly lower voltage if you wish to run SRBase. It's more cost efficient to run downvolted with slower results but much less electricity used. Besides, with a climate crisis upon humanity, it's not a great idea to run massively inefficient overclocks. I've downvolted my 1090t as far as possible and so it can still host my GPU crunchers till I can afford an new build. https://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/amd_phenom_x6_1090t/4.html An 8th gen Intel i5 8250u has as many threads, can do about the same amount of SRBase work and runs at 15 watts at max load and I've found laptops with it going for under $300 used. The FX-8350 draws 92W when it's doing no work at all... https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328-16.html | |
ID: 5538 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
@marmot | |
ID: 5539 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
... hmmmm | |
ID: 5561 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Max safe operating temp for that CPU is 62C. | |
ID: 5562 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
@marmot | |
ID: 5563 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Good to know how things causing invalid results. I have added this issue to the FAQ. | |
ID: 5565 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bestätigungsfehler...?