Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 14
Posts: 88
Credit: 408,649,499
RAC: 115,956
I'm not getting any work on this host:
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=205419
/ 
Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7650
Credit: 44,264,218
RAC: 11
I'm not getting any work on this host:
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=205419
I have deprecated this app for linux at the moment as long we get a new compiled version.
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7650
Credit: 44,264,218
RAC: 11
The windows opencl app was updated to the latest version.
All errors with the latest version. No changes on my end.
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=205182
switched back to the old version.
/ Reply
Quote
The Boinc manager clock elapsed time also resets every time after going into sleep mode. For example
this was reported to be done in 9000 secs
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/workunit.php?wuid=373443206
while this was reported to be done in 30000 secs
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/workunit.php?wuid=373443313
but they both took 8~9 hours, only that the first one had a break overnight.
I know that does not affect the calculation but it does affect the associated stats. Would appreciate if there is a simple fix.
____________
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7650
Credit: 44,264,218
RAC: 11
The Boinc manager clock elapsed time also resets every time after going into sleep mode. For example
this was reported to be done in 9000 secs
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/workunit.php?wuid=373443206
while this was reported to be done in 30000 secs
http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/workunit.php?wuid=373443313
but they both took 8~9 hours, only that the first one had a break overnight.
I know that does not affect the calculation but it does affect the associated stats. Would appreciate if there is a simple fix.
unfortunately not, the wrapper doesnt save the runtime after restart.
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7650
Credit: 44,264,218
RAC: 11
I have updated the credits for all remaining 77-78 WUs from 49500 to 165500.
/ Reply
Quote
Just copy the file libcudart.so.10.1 into your /lib64 folder (or whatever your distribution needs)
Last time 'just copy this to that' worked for me was under DOS. This is not DOS, this is Linux. libcudart.so.10.1 is totally unknown yet in the repo that supplies my software.
It goes even further. Under Linux, libcudart.so.10.1 is NOT part of the official CUDA 10.1 toolkit, not even of the official CUDA 10.2 toolkit. Both come with libcudart.so.9.1. You can only get libcudart.so.10.1 by adding an experimental PPA (Mageia) to your softwarelist. As libcudart.so.10.1 also has (inter)dependencies, merely copying the file in a directory will not be enough -but I wrote that earlier.
/ Reply
Quote
Just copy the file libcudart.so.10.1 into your /lib64 folder (or whatever your distribution needs)
Last time 'just copy this to that' worked for me was under DOS. This is not DOS, this is Linux. libcudart.so.10.1 is totally unknown yet in the repo that supplies my software.
It goes even further. Under Linux, libcudart.so.10.1 is NOT part of the official CUDA 10.1 toolkit, not even of the official CUDA 10.2 toolkit. Both come with libcudart.so.9.1. You can only get libcudart.so.10.1 by adding an experimental PPA (Mageia) to your softwarelist. As libcudart.so.10.1 also has (inter)dependencies, merely copying the file in a directory will not be enough -but I wrote that earlier.
with ubuntu 20.04 LTS
the nvidia-cuda-toolkit 10.1 package is present in the repositories
Linux Ubuntu
Ubuntu Focal Fossa (development branch) [5.4.0-21-generic|libc 2.31 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu7)]
7 Apr 2020, 11:17:41 UTC 7 Apr 2020, 12:00:46 UTC Terminé et validé 2,571.32 3.59 3,000.00 GPU72 v0.04 (cuda100)
/ Reply
Quote
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 14
Posts: 88
Credit: 408,649,499
RAC: 115,956
Just copy the file libcudart.so.10.1 into your /lib64 folder (or whatever your distribution needs)
Last time 'just copy this to that' worked for me was under DOS. This is not DOS, this is Linux. libcudart.so.10.1 is totally unknown yet in the repo that supplies my software.
It goes even further. Under Linux, libcudart.so.10.1 is NOT part of the official CUDA 10.1 toolkit, not even of the official CUDA 10.2 toolkit. Both come with libcudart.so.9.1. You can only get libcudart.so.10.1 by adding an experimental PPA (Mageia) to your softwarelist. As libcudart.so.10.1 also has (inter)dependencies, merely copying the file in a directory will not be enough -but I wrote that earlier.
I followed the instructions in FAQ and found libcudart.so.10.1 in one of the folders.
For all other PC's I copied libcudart.so.10.1 into the /lib64 folder and this works perferctly (for me).
/ Reply
Quote
with ubuntu 20.04 LTS the nvidia-cuda-toolkit 10.1 package is present in the repositories
Ubuntu 20.04 LTS is still in Beta, the official release date is April 23
/ Reply
Quote
Hello,
Since WU's never end, had to delete / cancel all tasks.
387956136 373440336 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 52,962.61 1,036.21 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
387956138 373440979 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 50,758.54 1,051.24 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
Machine ID 1080
Best regards,
Phil1966
/ Reply
Quote
Hello,
Since WU's never end, had to delete / cancel all tasks.
387956136 373440336 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 52,962.61 1,036.21 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
387956138 373440979 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 50,758.54 1,051.24 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
Machine ID 1080
Best regards,
Phil1966
Non il ne faut pas les annulés certaines sont très longues,mais il ne faut pas annuler.
7 Apr 2020, 7:59:36 UTC 7 Apr 2020, 23:58:58 UTC Terminé et validé 19,240.30 1,251.45 165,000.00 GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
/ Reply
Quote
Yes, but it depends on what GPUs you have. But if there's an error, the app would have stopped by itself earlier.
/ Reply
Quote
J'aurais dû demander sur notre Forum avant :)
Mais elles étaient bloquées à 100 % depuis plus de 10 heures ?
Sur des GTX 1080 ?
OK Vais réessayer plus tard.
Merci !
/ Reply
Quote
Hello,
Since WU's never end, had to delete / cancel all tasks.
387956136 373440336 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 52,962.61 1,036.21 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
387956138 373440979 1080 7 Apr 2020, 14:40:02 UTC 8 Apr 2020, 8:16:11 UTC Annulé par l'utilisateur 50,758.54 1,051.24 --- GPU72 v0.02 (cuda100)
Machine ID 1080
I'm sorry to inform you, that the workunits you are testing takes about 14,5 hours to complete on your GPU and it appears, by looking at the result file, that the computation was actually completed to 100% before being aborted. Did the BOINC manager not show the workunit as complete before you canceled the tests?
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7650
Credit: 44,264,218
RAC: 11
The name GPU72 was changed to Trial Factoring due a not permitted name. We have some issues with the person behind the project and ungrateful what we are doing.
All other changes will be done at the end of the month including badges. We want to continue helping Prime95 at mersenne.org
/ Reply
Quote
But I don't understand why Mr. Halsall doesn't want 76-77bit factoring.
/ Reply
Quote
But I don't understand why Mr. Halsall doesn't want 76-77bit factoring.
He did, but there has been some serious miscommunications and now SRBase has been told to remove all references to his personal project and continue on our own. We fortunantly for GIMPs has decided to continue on our own and we are currently in the process of finalising the details on how to reserve work for SRBase. So basically, there may be a temporary shortage of work available, while Rebirther renames the subproject and changes the badges, but after those changes has been made, there should as long as SRBase excist, never be a time without work.
Now let's go and chase some factors :)
/ Reply
Quote
Well, if it could be changed, I think the name of the subproject could be..um..more artistic? Though I'm pure brain and next to no art, I think TF78 would even be better ;)
Also, I'm sorry if I, of many people with slow GPUs, have hampered with your negotiation. My GPU takes 8 days straight to finish one of these tasks, and they give two times my existing credit! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
/ Reply
Quote
Well, if it could be changed, I think the name of the subproject could be..um..more artistic? Though I'm pure brain and next to no art, I think TF78 would even be better ;)
Maybe SRB72, or Reb72, or even UPU72 :D
Why limit yourself to just 72, think bigger :)
/ Reply
Quote