Trial Factoring

Author	Message
rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 7830 - Posted: 3 Aug 2021, 18:24:27 UTC Last modified: 18 Aug 2021, 12:03:21 UTC
We have moved to the GPU72 project to cleanup some smaller ranges, the latest batch is from 69-70bit in the 11.0-14.9M range, the runtime is around 23min on a RT5500XT, next stop is 70-71bit which was loaded before (20k tests).
ID: 7830 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 7843 - Posted: 7 Aug 2021, 18:27:56 UTC Last modified: 18 Aug 2021, 12:03:09 UTC
batch TF_69-70_4.4-6.9M should be TF_70-71_4.4-6.9M = 20k credits = 2h runtime (RT5500XT) batch TF_70-71_7-12.5M.txt = <1.5h runtime
ID: 7843 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 7863 - Posted: 21 Aug 2021, 19:01:04 UTC Last modified: 22 Aug 2021, 9:01:13 UTC
4 new batches loaded: TF_70-71_4-5M = ~2h TF_70-71_7-8M = ~1h20min TF_70-71_9-11M = ~1h TF_70-71_12-13M = ~46min based on a RT5500XT
ID: 7863 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 7903 - Posted: 14 Sep 2021, 20:37:42 UTC Last modified: 30 Oct 2021, 17:45:27 UTC
New upcoming batches (the last range is in progress): TF_71-72_5-6M = ~3,5h TF_71-72_6-7M = ~3h12min TF_71-72_7-8M = ~2h46min TF_71-72_8-9M = ~2h20min TF_71-72_9-10M = ~2h TF_71-72_10-11M = ~1h50min TF_71-72_11-12M = ~1h42min based on a RT5500XT
ID: 7903 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 7972 - Posted: 30 Oct 2021, 17:47:04 UTC
After the rest of the GPU72 cleanup is done we are working further on the 73-74bit 140-142M range.
ID: 7972 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bcavnaugh Send message Joined: 17 Apr 15 Posts: 9 Credit: 86,684,896 RAC: 0	Message 8119 - Posted: 18 Mar 2022, 0:30:54 UTC Last modified: 18 Mar 2022, 0:58:13 UTC
How do you fix this Error? 03/17/2022 18:25:57 \| SRBase \| [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting TF ran fine before. NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0 Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985 Thanks I did install a newer driver NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0 Still a No Go
ID: 8119 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8122 - Posted: 18 Mar 2022, 6:06:51 UTC - in response to Message 8119.
How do you fix this Error? 03/17/2022 18:25:57 \| SRBase \| [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting TF ran fine before. NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0 Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985 Thanks I did install a newer driver NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0 Still a No Go https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/forum_thread.php?id=6&postid=5765 I prefer 410.x to 455.x for CUDA 10/11, the 2080 doesnt run on newer CUDA versions
ID: 8122 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bcavnaugh Send message Joined: 17 Apr 15 Posts: 9 Credit: 86,684,896 RAC: 0	Message 8133 - Posted: 18 Mar 2022, 18:36:37 UTC - in response to Message 8122. Last modified: 18 Mar 2022, 18:38:49 UTC
How do you fix this Error? 03/17/2022 18:25:57 \| SRBase \| [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting TF ran fine before. NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0 Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985 Thanks I did install a newer driver NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0 Still a No Go https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/forum_thread.php?id=6&postid=5765 I prefer 410.x to 455.x for CUDA 10/11, the 2080 doesnt run on newer CUDA versions Thanks, That is odd only because my other hosts are running them fine on 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0/ 2080 https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=217357 3090 [/url]https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=217218[url] I will change drivers and see what gives ____________ Crunching@EVGA The Number One Team in the BOINC Community. Folding@EVGA The Number One Team in the Folding@Home Community.
ID: 8133 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8134 - Posted: 18 Mar 2022, 18:42:26 UTC - in response to Message 8133.
That is strange, you got the right app but there must be something different, maybe something missing in cc_config
ID: 8134 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bcavnaugh Send message Joined: 17 Apr 15 Posts: 9 Credit: 86,684,896 RAC: 0	Message 8136 - Posted: 19 Mar 2022, 0:31:14 UTC - in response to Message 8134. Last modified: 19 Mar 2022, 0:49:37 UTC
That is strange, you got the right app but there must be something different, maybe something missing in cc_config It is, the cc files are all the same, I am now going back to an Old Driver. But I do not see 455, So going back it not so simple after all. Maybe time to update the Application to a driver that is at least in the last 6 Months. NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.84 December 13, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.47 November 10, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.39 October 26, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.12 September 20, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.68 August 10, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.41 July 19, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.11 June 23, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 462.59 May 11, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 462.31 April 14, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.92 March 17, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.72 February 25, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.40 January 26, 2021 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 460.89 December 15, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 457.30 November 17, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 456.71 October 20, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 456.38 September 17, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 452.06 August 18, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 451.77 July 16, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 451.48 June 24, 2020 NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 442.92 April 16, 2020 Here is one for the record books; I was cleaning up the old driver and I start by removing the NVIDIA Audio Driver and restarting the computer, well I tested TF and lo and behold it is now running..... https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985 https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=1985&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid=20 So I never really use this Audio Driver so I guess I will stop installing it.
ID: 8136 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bluestang Send message Joined: 6 Jun 19 Posts: 60 Credit: 2,244,690,070 RAC: 238,442	Message 8416 - Posted: 25 Oct 2022, 20:17:02 UTC
I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error. Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors... 10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM \| SRBase \| Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent
ID: 8416 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bluestang Send message Joined: 6 Jun 19 Posts: 60 Credit: 2,244,690,070 RAC: 238,442	Message 8420 - Posted: 27 Oct 2022, 23:51:06 UTC - in response to Message 8416.
Anyone?
ID: 8420 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8421 - Posted: 28 Oct 2022, 10:26:02 UTC - in response to Message 8416.
I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error. Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors... 10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM \| SRBase \| Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected
ID: 8421 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bluestang Send message Joined: 6 Jun 19 Posts: 60 Credit: 2,244,690,070 RAC: 238,442	Message 8422 - Posted: 28 Oct 2022, 16:29:36 UTC - in response to Message 8421.
I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error. Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors... 10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM \| SRBase \| Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected Well, the WUs are throwing the Computation Errors anytime during the calculation. They're all over the place time wise when it happens. This machine has had no issues in the past running this project. Only thing that change was a driver update, but rolling back to previous NVIDIA driver known to work did not solve it. Did the recent system crash on your end corrupt anything that would cause this? This does have dual 1660ti GPUs in it, but if you know what you are doing then you can run WUs on both GPUs. Although if the application was written correctly it would do that by itself without any user input!
ID: 8422 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8423 - Posted: 28 Oct 2022, 20:30:18 UTC - in response to Message 8422.
I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error. Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors... 10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM \| SRBase \| Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected Well, the WUs are throwing the Computation Errors anytime during the calculation. They're all over the place time wise when it happens. This machine has had no issues in the past running this project. Only thing that change was a driver update, but rolling back to previous NVIDIA driver known to work did not solve it. Did the recent system crash on your end corrupt anything that would cause this? This does have dual 1660ti GPUs in it, but if you know what you are doing then you can run WUs on both GPUs. Although if the application was written correctly it would do that by itself without any user input! The WU can only be run on device 0, nothing has changed
ID: 8423 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bluestang Send message Joined: 6 Jun 19 Posts: 60 Credit: 2,244,690,070 RAC: 238,442	Message 8424 - Posted: 29 Oct 2022, 1:49:35 UTC
Yes, I know about the device 0 only issue. Like I said, I was able to get around that issue and use both GPUs many times before since this app came out. I'll just figure it out myself as usual.
ID: 8424 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8425 - Posted: 30 Oct 2022, 12:30:41 UTC - in response to Message 8424.
Yes, I know about the device 0 only issue. Like I said, I was able to get around that issue and use both GPUs many times before since this app came out. I'll just figure it out myself as usual. I have changed the FAQ. You are using something like -d 1 in your config which doesnt work. Try to change your cc_config.xml <cc_config> <options> <exclude_gpu> <url>http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/</url> <type>Nvidia</type> <device_num>1</device_num> <app>TF</app> </exclude_gpu> <use_all_gpus>1</use_all_gpus> </options> </cc_config>
ID: 8425 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8577 - Posted: 27 Dec 2022, 15:44:33 UTC
The cuda11 apps are updated for linux. Whats new? the libcudart.so.10.1 lib is now included in the zip package I hope this will solve running cuda11 apps where cuda10 is only installed but have a higher driver version.
ID: 8577 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8587 - Posted: 29 Dec 2022, 19:12:03 UTC
cuda12 app for linux is now online, windows as soon as available, maybe faster on 4xxx cards.
ID: 8587 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,626,701 RAC: 38,419	Message 8590 - Posted: 30 Dec 2022, 7:40:13 UTC
The cuda12 app doesnt work, at the moment it is deprecated.
ID: 8590 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Author

Message

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

500k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

We have moved to the GPU72 project to cleanup some smaller ranges, the latest batch is from 69-70bit in the 11.0-14.9M range, the runtime is around 23min on a RT5500XT, next stop is 70-71bit which was loaded before (20k tests).

ID: 7830 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

batch TF_69-70_4.4-6.9M should be TF_70-71_4.4-6.9M = 20k credits = 2h runtime (RT5500XT)
batch TF_70-71_7-12.5M.txt = <1.5h runtime

ID: 7843 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

4 new batches loaded:

TF_70-71_4-5M = ~2h
TF_70-71_7-8M = ~1h20min
TF_70-71_9-11M = ~1h
TF_70-71_12-13M = ~46min

based on a RT5500XT

ID: 7863 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

New upcoming batches (the last range is in progress):

TF_71-72_5-6M = ~3,5h
TF_71-72_6-7M = ~3h12min
TF_71-72_7-8M = ~2h46min
TF_71-72_8-9M = ~2h20min
TF_71-72_9-10M = ~2h
TF_71-72_10-11M = ~1h50min
TF_71-72_11-12M = ~1h42min

based on a RT5500XT

ID: 7903 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

After the rest of the GPU72 cleanup is done we are working further on the 73-74bit 140-142M range.

ID: 7972 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bcavnaugh

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 15
Posts: 9
Credit: 86,684,896
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

500k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

100k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

How do you fix this Error?
03/17/2022 18:25:57 | SRBase | [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting

TF ran fine before.
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0
Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985
Thanks
I did install a newer driver
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0
Still a No Go

ID: 8119 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

How do you fix this Error?
03/17/2022 18:25:57 | SRBase | [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting

TF ran fine before.
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0
Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985
Thanks
I did install a newer driver
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0
Still a No Go

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/forum_thread.php?id=6&postid=5765

I prefer 410.x to 455.x for CUDA 10/11, the 2080 doesnt run on newer CUDA versions

ID: 8122 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bcavnaugh

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 15
Posts: 9
Credit: 86,684,896
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

How do you fix this Error?
03/17/2022 18:25:57 | SRBase | [error] Missing coprocessor for task TF_73-74_289-299M_wu_77396_0; aborting

TF ran fine before.
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 472.84 OpenCL: 3.0
Host https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985
Thanks
I did install a newer driver
NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB) driver: 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0
Still a No Go

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/forum_thread.php?id=6&postid=5765

I prefer 410.x to 455.x for CUDA 10/11, the 2080 doesnt run on newer CUDA versions

Thanks,
That is odd only because my other hosts are running them fine on 511.09 OpenCL: 3.0/

2080
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=217357

3090
[/url]https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=217218[url]
I will change drivers and see what gives
____________

Crunching@EVGA The Number One Team in the BOINC Community. Folding@EVGA The Number One Team in the Folding@Home Community.

ID: 8133 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

That is strange, you got the right app but there must be something different, maybe something missing in cc_config

ID: 8134 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bcavnaugh

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 15
Posts: 9
Credit: 86,684,896
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

That is strange, you got the right app but there must be something different, maybe something missing in cc_config

It is, the cc files are all the same, I am now going back to an Old Driver.
But I do not see 455, So going back it not so simple after all.
Maybe time to update the Application to a driver that is at least in the last 6 Months.

NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.84 December 13, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.47 November 10, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.39 October 26, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 472.12 September 20, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.68 August 10, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.41 July 19, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 471.11 June 23, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 462.59 May 11, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 462.31 April 14, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.92 March 17, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.72 February 25, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 461.40 January 26, 2021
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 460.89 December 15, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 457.30 November 17, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 456.71 October 20, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 456.38 September 17, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 452.06 August 18, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 451.77 July 16, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 451.48 June 24, 2020
NVIDIA Studio Driver WHQL 442.92 April 16, 2020

Here is one for the record books;
I was cleaning up the old driver and I start by removing the NVIDIA Audio Driver and restarting the computer, well I tested TF and lo and behold it is now running.....
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1985
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=1985&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid=20
So I never really use this Audio Driver so I guess I will stop installing it.

ID: 8136 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bluestang
Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 19
Posts: 60
Credit: 2,244,690,070
RAC: 238,442
10k in Riesel Base credit

10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error.

Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors...

10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM | SRBase | Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent

ID: 8416 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bluestang
Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 19
Posts: 60
Credit: 2,244,690,070
RAC: 238,442
10k in Riesel Base credit

Anyone?

ID: 8420 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error.

Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors...

10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM | SRBase | Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent

The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected

ID: 8421 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bluestang
Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 19
Posts: 60
Credit: 2,244,690,070
RAC: 238,442
10k in Riesel Base credit

I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error.

Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors...

10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM | SRBase | Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent

The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected

Well, the WUs are throwing the Computation Errors anytime during the calculation. They're all over the place time wise when it happens.

This machine has had no issues in the past running this project. Only thing that change was a driver update, but rolling back to previous NVIDIA driver known to work did not solve it.

Did the recent system crash on your end corrupt anything that would cause this?

This does have dual 1660ti GPUs in it, but if you know what you are doing then you can run WUs on both GPUs. Although if the application was written correctly it would do that by itself without any user input!

ID: 8422 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

I'm getting that "absent file" error on some WUs and they end up throwing Computation Error.

Haven't ran this in a while, but same setup that used to work well months ago now has these errors...

10/25/2022 4:11:25 PM | SRBase | Output file TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0_0 for task TF_73-74_698-709M_wu_44271_0 absent

The calculation crashed in the middle thats why the output file was rejected

Well, the WUs are throwing the Computation Errors anytime during the calculation. They're all over the place time wise when it happens.

This machine has had no issues in the past running this project. Only thing that change was a driver update, but rolling back to previous NVIDIA driver known to work did not solve it.

Did the recent system crash on your end corrupt anything that would cause this?

This does have dual 1660ti GPUs in it, but if you know what you are doing then you can run WUs on both GPUs. Although if the application was written correctly it would do that by itself without any user input!

The WU can only be run on device 0, nothing has changed

ID: 8423 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

bluestang
Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 19
Posts: 60
Credit: 2,244,690,070
RAC: 238,442
10k in Riesel Base credit

Yes, I know about the device 0 only issue. Like I said, I was able to get around that issue and use both GPUs many times before since this app came out.

I'll just figure it out myself as usual.

ID: 8424 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Yes, I know about the device 0 only issue. Like I said, I was able to get around that issue and use both GPUs many times before since this app came out.

I'll just figure it out myself as usual.

I have changed the FAQ. You are using something like -d 1 in your config which doesnt work. Try to change your cc_config.xml

<cc_config> <options> <exclude_gpu> <url>http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/</url> <type>Nvidia</type> <device_num>1</device_num> <app>TF</app> </exclude_gpu> <use_all_gpus>1</use_all_gpus> </options> </cc_config>

ID: 8425 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

The cuda11 apps are updated for linux.

Whats new?
the libcudart.so.10.1 lib is now included in the zip package

I hope this will solve running cuda11 apps where cuda10 is only installed but have a higher driver version.

ID: 8577 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

cuda12 app for linux is now online, windows as soon as available, maybe faster on 4xxx cards.

ID: 8587 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,626,701
RAC: 38,419
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

The cuda12 app doesnt work, at the moment it is deprecated.

ID: 8590 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote