Trial Factoring tests

Message boards : Number crunching : Trial Factoring tests

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next

Author	Message
dannyridel Send message Joined: 21 Jul 19 Posts: 63 Credit: 15,355,619 RAC: 74,346	Message 6149 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 3:05:02 UTC - in response to Message 6148.
	Even though your APU is not recognized, I think selecting APU will be slower than "AUTO" - kernels used on the APU settings were tested on much older, different APU's (if i recall correctly, that was tuned for A8-3850... released 2011.) I'm hoping I can test the IGP of the Ryzen 2400g that I get occasional access to... Ah ok, I tried GCN now and it seems to be okay too.
	ID: 6149 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6151 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 7:03:12 UTC - in response to Message 6144.
	I have extended the parameter list for mfakto. (and compiled) You can download it frome here: https://p-numbers.net/mfakto_linux_x86_64_device.zip HTH the new code snippet: else if(!strcmp((char)"--device", argv[i])) { if(i+1 >= argc) { printf("ERROR: no device number specified for option \"--device\"\n"); return ERR_PARAM; } else if (argv[i+1][0] == '0') // parse to 00 { devicenumber = strtol("00",&ptr,10); if(ptr \|\| errno \|\| devicenumber != strtol("00",&ptr,10) ) { printf("ERROR: can't parse for option \"--device\"\n"); return ERR_PARAM; } } i++; }[/url] This app is now up.
	ID: 6151 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6152 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 7:33:20 UTC - in response to Message 6151.
	Thanks, now I get a new error: process exited with code 195 This is an error from BOINC (wrapper) 195 is CHILD_FAILED, Which means the wrapper failed to start the worker app.
	ID: 6152 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6153 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 7:41:28 UTC - in response to Message 6152. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 7:41:41 UTC
	Thanks, now I get a new error: process exited with code 195 This is an error from BOINC (wrapper) 195 is CHILD_FAILED, Which means the wrapper failed to start the worker app. I have tried it on the server (ubuntu) and the wrapper is starting the app (CPU), selftest was ok. Did you use the same wrapper?
	ID: 6153 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6154 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 7:56:33 UTC - in response to Message 6153.
	All my "standalone tests" are okay too. I think the problem ist that mfakto-x86_64 starts a child process to compile the mfakto_Kernels.elf file. I seems that this forces the CHILD_FAILED error. Can you include this file: https://p-numbers.net/mfakto_Kernels.elf in the ZIP? (Just for a test)
	ID: 6154 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6155 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:02:00 UTC - in response to Message 6154. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 8:27:31 UTC
	All my "standalone tests" are okay too. I think the problem ist that mfakto-x86_64 starts a child process to compile the mfakto_Kernels.elf file. I seems that this forces the CHILD_FAILED error. Can you include this file: https://p-numbers.net/mfakto_Kernels.elf in the ZIP? (Just for a test) I hope you will not get an error, I put this in v5 zip. Update I have seen the error which I have expected, v7 is available.
	ID: 6155 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6156 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:29:36 UTC - in response to Message 6155. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 8:30:04 UTC
	I get an error (two): A new attached PC: Download error (checksum fail) Previously attached: The old ZIP (without elf-file) remains, if you replace the file manually the file is deleted (zip error). It seems you have to create a new version, sorry.
	ID: 6156 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6157 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:42:42 UTC - in response to Message 6156.
	On both of my PC with AMD GPU: error 195 from wrapper, with or without elf-file?!
	ID: 6157 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6158 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:43:29 UTC - in response to Message 6157.
	On both of my PC with AMD GPU: error 195 from wrapper, with or without elf-file?! with the .elf file
	ID: 6158 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6159 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:56:39 UTC - in response to Message 6158. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 8:59:17 UTC
	Yes with elf-file. But in the tests before (zip without elf-file) was the same error. Standalone test with wrapper and job.xml succeeded. So I don't know what the problem is. Sofware is o.k., but if the wrapper is started inside BOINC it fails.
	ID: 6159 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6160 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 8:59:52 UTC - in response to Message 6159. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 9:04:12 UTC
	Yes with elf-file. But in the tests before (zip without elf-file) was the same error. If the old wrapper was currently working in standalone then it must also be running in BOINC, this is odd, do you have a chance to compile the linux wrapper from the latest BOINC code? So we could trying if the latest wrapper is running. https://github.com/BOINC/boinc (in samples folder)
	ID: 6160 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6161 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 9:25:29 UTC - in response to Message 6160.
	You can download here: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper Version information: wolfgang@i920:~/Downloads/boinc-client_release-7-7.16/samples/wrapper> ./wrapper --version 11:22:17 (26004): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 7.16.6 11:22:17 (26004): called boinc_finish(0) If you need a verion from trunk, I can compile it too. It shouldn't differ from this version here.
	ID: 6161 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6162 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 9:36:44 UTC - in response to Message 6161. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 9:53:00 UTC
	You can download here: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper Version information: wolfgang@i920:~/Downloads/boinc-client_release-7-7.16/samples/wrapper> ./wrapper --version 11:22:17 (26004): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 7.16.6 11:22:17 (26004): called boinc_finish(0) If you need a verion from trunk, I can compile it too. It shouldn't differ from this version here. v8 app is up with new wrapper Update: damnit, the execute bit was not set for wrapper. v9 is up Looks like its running? But there are no checkpoints, if you are able to put the checkpoint code into the new wrapper code that would be great, I think the Mac app should be running too with the new wrapper.
	ID: 6162 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6163 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 10:40:15 UTC - in response to Message 6162.
	No doesn't work: version `GLIBC_2.29' not found The PC where I took the wrapper from has a very new linux and this dependency is awful. I compiled BOINC on Ubuntu 18.04, and this wrapper should be o.k.: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper_26016 For Linux it's a hard way to deploy software.....
	ID: 6163 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6164 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 15:34:21 UTC - in response to Message 6163. Last modified: 13 Apr 2020, 16:08:23 UTC
	No doesn't work: version `GLIBC_2.29' not found The PC where I took the wrapper from has a very new linux and this dependency is awful. I compiled BOINC on Ubuntu 18.04, and this wrapper should be o.k.: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper_26016 For Linux it's a hard way to deploy software..... Linux shows me as shared lib not as executable file. I need a corrected file, cannot change it in config.
	ID: 6164 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6165 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 16:40:27 UTC - in response to Message 6164.
	Oops, can you try this one: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper_26016_7.16
	ID: 6165 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6166 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 17:02:14 UTC - in response to Message 6165.
	Oops, can you try this one: https://p-numbers.net/wrapper_26016_7.16 is up, I have tried to compile it on the old ubuntu, no chance, I think the code isnt working anymore with older OS.
	ID: 6166 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6167 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 17:13:52 UTC - in response to Message 6166.
	And it's running! stderr: 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 () DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument Assuming 131072kB available aperture size. May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering. get chip id failed: -1 [2] param: 4, val: 0 After one minute it jumped to 100% ?! The first checkpoint was generated after 300 s.
	ID: 6167 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7479 Credit: 43,687,101 RAC: 41,962	Message 6168 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 17:15:14 UTC - in response to Message 6167.
	And it's running! stderr: 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper (7.16.26016): starting 19:07:26 (16398): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 () DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument Assuming 131072kB available aperture size. May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering. get chip id failed: -1 [2] param: 4, val: 0 After one minute it jumped to 100% ?! The first checkpoint was generated after 300 s. ok but there is no checkpointing in the wrapper code.
	ID: 6168 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 4,661	Message 6169 - Posted: 13 Apr 2020, 17:17:16 UTC - in response to Message 6168.
	The checkpoint is generated from mfakto with the name: M97983883.ckp
	ID: 6169 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Trial Factoring tests