Where do you find your discovered factors?
You unfortunantly can't see that information. It would be unreasonably to ask for Reb, to show factors found and by who - not just because the information (to my knowledge) is not saved in a way that makes it possible to say wich user found wich factor. Also, currently SRBase is finding about 6-8 thousand factors a day, so can you imagine the data needed to display the information about factor finder. You can however get a rough estimate how many factors you have found, by multiplying your completed tasks with 0.01436 - that will give you an approximate amount of factors found by you :)
/ 
Reply
Quote
Ok, thanks for the information! Not worth the effort for him to even consider it. Was just curious on results.
Thanks, you guys are really on top of things here and that goes along way with us crunchers.
/ Reply
Quote
For the slower GPUs you can almost track on your completed wus which ones have a factor, but this is a manual search. If the factor is found in the beginning of the bit depth then you can easily see by lower timings but if it is found at the end the search is more complicated. Since my wus are ran each 700 seconds or so, any timings below 500-600 seconds have indeed a factor. Faster machines are tricky...
/ Reply
Quote
@bluestang
Anyway you can copy your results from boinc directories before they get uploaded to the project server. Not very exciting though because those factors are not rare numbers. Remarkable numbers are tracked by admins.
/ Reply
Quote
Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 18
Posts: 21
Credit: 1,450,954,846
RAC: 7,524,253
Hello,
Do you have any news ?
Will it soon be possible to compute TF WUs with two GPUs simultaneously on a single computer ?
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7448
Credit: 42,730,867
RAC: 0
Hello,
Do you have any news ?
Will it soon be possible to compute TF WUs with two GPUs simultaneously on a single computer ?
no news yet, I need to contact the developer of the app but it wasnt implemented yet.
/ Reply
Quote
Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 18
Posts: 21
Credit: 1,450,954,846
RAC: 7,524,253
Okay, got it.
Thank you.
I can't wait to double my workload for TF !
/ Reply
Quote
Okay, got it.
Thank you.
I can't wait to double my workload for TF !
+1
/ Reply
Quote
Any idea how low calculation times will get for the current work 73 – 74 M? Current runtime is sitting around 3 minutes for a RTX 2070. Giving 3000 credits Thanks in advance
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7448
Credit: 42,730,867
RAC: 0
Any idea how low calculation times will get for the current work 73 – 74 M? Current runtime is sitting around 3 minutes for a RTX 2070. Giving 3000 credits Thanks in advance
Could be the halfth every 100M
/ Reply
Quote
Any idea how low calculation times will get for the current work 73 – 74 M? Current runtime is sitting around 3 minutes for a RTX 2070. Giving 3000 credits Thanks in advance
If it takes around 180 seconds on a RTX 2070 for n=360M - wich appears to be the beginning of this batch - it will take approximately 174 seconds at n=372M. In case you need to know in the future, the formula is as follows:
(nMin / nMax) x seconds to complete nMin test
Take care.
/ Reply
Quote