Hello,
The predicted runtime for SR Base long, long2 and long3 is way too short.
Boinc Manager loaded about 360 in total.
The total predicted runtime for all of them in Boinc Manager is 1 hour and 6 minutes, and they all should finish before May 30 at 17:54h.
(The predicted runtime for a single WU is about 30 seconds)
I watched a couple of them running: progress goes to 100% in about 5 minutes and stays that way for the rest of their lives. (Time to finish is zero).
Some of these WU's are from type R430.
According to [url]Message 8860[/url] the runtime for R430 is between 5h16min and 8h13min.
This means, that most of the WU's won't make the deadline.
I think this is a waste of resources.
System info: i5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz; 24GB; Windows 10
/ 
Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7496
Credit: 44,029,375
RAC: 36,320
Hello,
The predicted runtime for SR Base long, long2 and long3 is way too short.
Boinc Manager loaded about 360 in total.
The total predicted runtime for all of them in Boinc Manager is 1 hour and 6 minutes, and they all should finish before May 30 at 17:54h.
(The predicted runtime for a single WU is about 30 seconds)
I watched a couple of them running: progress goes to 100% in about 5 minutes and stays that way for the rest of their lives. (Time to finish is zero).
Some of these WU's are from type R430.
According to [url]Message 8860[/url] the runtime for R430 is between 5h16min and 8h13min.
This means, that most of the WU's won't make the deadline.
I think this is a waste of resources.
System info: i5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz; 24GB; Windows 10
This always happened after updating apps, after a few results the server will update the estimated runtime, Iam not happy with this situation, the boinc devs need to think about it. Results which cant be finished in time will be aborted by the client.
/ Reply
Quote