rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 4,918
We are still trying to fix the suspend linux wrapper issue but no progress yet.
A short conclusion so far:
- the latest boinc wrapper code is working with suspend
- suspend is working on BOINC client (view status) but status failed in background on wrapper and app (running further)
- linux and windows source code (without the latest changes) are the same where suspend is working on windows
If you have some experiences with c++ and BOINC let me know. The current wrapper source code can be found here https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/forum_thread.php?id=360&postid=8934
/ 
Reply
Quote
May be I'm wrong, but I can try to tell that may be a difference from the sleep() function from Windows and Linux.
In Windows the sleep(x) means x/1000 seconds I'm not sure if also in Linux has the same meaning.
In the past I had a discussion with a Linux programmer for a Boinc project for his graduate thesis and I remember a difference from the two functions.
If this is not the solution, I'sorry
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 4,918
May be I'm wrong, but I can try to tell that may be a difference from the sleep() function from Windows and Linux.
In Windows the sleep(x) means x/1000 seconds I'm not sure if also in Linux has the same meaning.
In the past I had a discussion with a Linux programmer for a Boinc project for his graduate thesis and I remember a difference from the two functions.
If this is not the solution, I'sorry
Its the same in linux.
/ Reply
Quote
It may or may not be helpful.
>By default, waitpid() waits only for terminated children, but this behavior is modifiable via the options argument, as described below.
https://linux.die.net/man/2/waitpid
P.S.
Sorry, I've made a mistake. Just ignore this, please.
/ Reply
Quote