log in |
Message boards : News : All apps have been replaced
Author | Message |
---|---|
by the new prst app. There are some issues with similar CPUs and Riesel Bases (-1), Sierpinski Base is fine:
1 (0x1) Unknown error number The gwnum must have a bug, already reported to the dev. If you have such errors with these CPUs, disable work for -1 bases until this is fixed. | |
ID: 9138 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I am glad it is just GWNUM (or the Intel CPU design itself?) that is at error here, it happened just when I added some extra libraries for multiple and arbitrary precision on my J5005.... | |
ID: 9161 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I am glad it is just GWNUM (or the Intel CPU design itself?) that is at error here, it happened just when I added some extra libraries for multiple and arbitrary precision on my J5005.... must be something in gwnum lib, +1 bases are fine, something with FFT length I think. | |
ID: 9163 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
by the new prst app. There are some issues with similar CPUs and Riesel Bases (-1), Sierpinski Base is fine: Just a hunch: You do know that these CPU's have a thing in common? No L3 cache. If your code for -1 bases explicitely makes use of L3 cache than they will fail. | |
ID: 9185 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
by the new prst app. There are some issues with similar CPUs and Riesel Bases (-1), Sierpinski Base is fine: Should work, +1 did, if Iam getting a chance to compile the latest prst source with gwnum 30.18 to test then I will know more, no feedback from the dev yet. | |
ID: 9186 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/download/PRST-11-test.zip prst.exe -boinc -fermat "13288*96^204730-1" | |
ID: 9197 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards :
News :
All apps have been replaced