log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Deadline change on S79?
Author | Message |
---|---|
Was the deadline on S79 lowered to 6 hours without an announcement? I've had several tasks canceled at around that point for allegedly hitting the deadline. https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=135484423 is an example. | |
ID: 9400 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Was the deadline on S79 lowered to 6 hours without an announcement? I've had several tasks canceled at around that point for allegedly hitting the deadline. https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=135484423 is an example. no, its correct with 12h Sent 23 Dec 2023, 5:08:00 UTC Report deadline 23 Dec 2023, 17:08:00 UTC | |
ID: 9401 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Was the deadline on S79 lowered to 6 hours without an announcement? I've had several tasks canceled at around that point for allegedly hitting the deadline. https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=135484423 is an example. Server-side, it's right, but both of my clients (different versions and OS's) are displaying six-hour deadlines. Is this a client bug? Edit: This is the only project I'm having this issue with. WUProp's deadline is an even 7 days from the task download, for example. | |
ID: 9402 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Was the deadline on S79 lowered to 6 hours without an announcement? I've had several tasks canceled at around that point for allegedly hitting the deadline. https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=135484423 is an example. Perhaps the grace_period of 6h, 6h more time is available for a WU before a replica will be sent out. | |
ID: 9403 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I have this problem since I turn off my machines for ~7 hours to avoid very punitive peak time electricity pricing. | |
ID: 9404 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Is there any kind of penalty I'm not seeing? The ones lost due to this generally disappear within a few days as Rebirther purges the database | |
ID: 9405 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I see the issue with the deadline, instead 12h + 6h (grace_period) it was 6h + 6h, the boinc client cant see the grace_period so you have only 6h. | |
ID: 9414 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
No penalty, that was just the percentage of works units lost to error "Not started by deadline" over work units completed between database purges. Looks like Rebirther found and fixed the error. ____________ Primes Found: 50*893^231310-1 (Top 5000) 20*634^476756-1 (Top 5000) 96*789^506568+1 (Top 5000) 225*370^322863-1 (Top 5000) 3293*82^335630-1 (Top 5000) 18431*82^467690-1 (Top 5000) More primes on prestacki.com! | |
ID: 9415 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Deadline change on S79?