Linux TF WUs on ATI 6800 cards
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Linux TF WUs on ATI 6800 cards

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author Message
Skip Da Shu
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 23
Posts: 25
Credit: 70,495,902
RAC: 87,393
Message 9785 - Posted: 19 Mar 2024, 22:27:31 UTC
Last modified: 19 Mar 2024, 22:30:17 UTC

Anybody running TF tasks on a RX6800/xt under Linux?

Mine all error out. Here's an example of the result:

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=146304032


Here's a PrimeGrid WU run on the same box w/ same card:

http://www.primegrid.com/result.php?resultid=1735004275

Einstein & Asteroids also work on this box.

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9789 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 6:18:02 UTC - in response to Message 9785.

The same for me on a VII.
All end with error, exit code 195

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9790 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 9:35:49 UTC - in response to Message 9789.

The same for me on a VII.
All end with error, exit code 195


ok, we need to investigate.

Skip Da Shu
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 23
Posts: 25
Credit: 70,495,902
RAC: 87,393
Message 9791 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 12:38:28 UTC

more recent result that's (as of this minute) still visible:

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=146304034

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9792 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 12:47:03 UTC - in response to Message 9791.

more recent result that's (as of this minute) still visible:

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=146304034


can you try a selftest

./mfakto -st


outside boinc?

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9794 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 13:37:28 UTC - in response to Message 9789.

The same for me on a VII.
All end with error, exit code 195


Can you also be running a selftest, unfortunately most of the issues coming from linux where windows has no problems.

./mfakto -st


We need to collect some datas and track down the issue.

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9795 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 18:29:56 UTC - in response to Message 9794.
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 18:41:30 UTC

The same for me on a VII.
All end with error, exit code 195


Can you also be running a selftest, unfortunately most of the issues coming from linux where windows has no problems.

./mfakto -st


We need to collect some datas and track down the issue.

Sure, but I need more instruction where or how to do this selftest.
In the terminal the command is unknown. In the project folder there is also no mfakto file.

I can offer this:

<core_client_version>7.16.6</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message>
<stderr_txt>
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 (-d 0)
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper: created child process 291204
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): ./mfakto-x64 exited; CPU time 0.002019
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): app exit status: 0x1
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): called boinc_finish(195)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

./mfakto-x64 -st is also not working. Maybe the needed app was not downloaded in the project folder? There is only a mfakto-linux64-v10.zip file. Shall I upzip this?
Edit: unpacked and startet. Something is running...

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9796 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 18:39:04 UTC - in response to Message 9795.

The same for me on a VII.
All end with error, exit code 195


Can you also be running a selftest, unfortunately most of the issues coming from linux where windows has no problems.

./mfakto -st


We need to collect some datas and track down the issue.

Sure, but I need more instruction where or how to do this selftest.
In the terminal the command is unknown. In the project folder there is also no mfakto file.

I can offer this:

7.16.6

process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)


2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 (-d 0)
2024-03-21 14:29:27 (291202): wrapper: created child process 291204
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): ./mfakto-x64 exited; CPU time 0.002019
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): app exit status: 0x1
2024-03-21 14:29:28 (291202): called boinc_finish(195)


]]>

./mfakto-x64 -st is also not working. Maybe the needed app was not downloaded in the project folder? There is only a mfakto-linux64-v10.zip file. Shall I upzip this?


You only need to extract the zipfile in another folder and run the command, thats all

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9797 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 18:41:03 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 18:42:23 UTC

done. failed.

./mfakto-x64 -st


######### test case 34071/34071 (M112404491[91-92]) #########
Starting trial factoring M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 (4461450.54 GHz-days)
Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait
Mar 21 19:45 | 1848 0.1% | 0.010 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00%
M112404491 has a factor: 3941616367695054034124905537 (91.670846 bits, 2992945.937358 GHz-d)

found 1 factor for M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2]
self-test for M112404491 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)!
tf(): total time spent: 0.011s

Self-test statistics
number of tests 34026
successful tests 33288
no factor found 738

self-test FAILED!

ERROR: self-test failed, exiting.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9798 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 18:52:42 UTC - in response to Message 9797.

done. failed.

./mfakto-x64 -st


######### test case 34071/34071 (M112404491[91-92]) #########
Starting trial factoring M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 (4461450.54 GHz-days)
Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait
Mar 21 19:45 | 1848 0.1% | 0.010 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00%
M112404491 has a factor: 3941616367695054034124905537 (91.670846 bits, 2992945.937358 GHz-d)

found 1 factor for M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2]
self-test for M112404491 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)!
tf(): total time spent: 0.011s

Self-test statistics
number of tests 34026
successful tests 33288
no factor found 738

self-test FAILED!

ERROR: self-test failed, exiting.


thx, could be the kernel file of mfakto, vega7 and 6000er had no pretests under linux.

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9799 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 19:10:58 UTC

In my case it is a vega20 (radeon VII)

TF v0.17 (opencl_ati_101) was running fine last year.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9800 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 19:12:56 UTC - in response to Message 9799.

In my case it is a vega20 (radeon VII)

TF v0.17 (opencl_ati_101) was running fine last year.


and it was successful with linux?

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9801 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 20:04:53 UTC - in response to Message 9800.

In my case it is a vega20 (radeon VII)

TF v0.17 (opencl_ati_101) was running fine last year.


and it was successful with linux?

Yes, running ~1100seconds and got 13500 credits

Skip Da Shu
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 23
Posts: 25
Credit: 70,495,902
RAC: 87,393
Message 9802 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 21:49:00 UTC - in response to Message 9792.
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 22:34:42 UTC

ES7C95:/var/lib/boinc-client/projects/srbase.my-firewall.org_sr5/mfakto-test/mfakto-linux64-v10# ./mfakto-x64 -st > test.log


18.1MB test.log contents below -- Truncated. Is there a way to send you the file or do u just want the last page of it?

mfakto 0.15pre8 (64-bit build) Runtime options INI file mfakto.ini Verbosity 1 SieveOnGPU yes MoreClasses yes GPUSievePrimes 82486 GPUSieveProcessSize 24 Kib GPUSieveSize 96 Mib FlushInterval 8 WorkFile worktodo.txt ResultsFile results.txt Checkpoints enabled CheckpointDelay 60 s Stages enabled StopAfterFactor class PrintMode compact V5UserID none ComputerID none TimeStampInResults no VectorSize 2 GPUType AUTO SmallExp no UseBinfile mfakto_Kernels.elf Compile-time options Select device - Get device info: OpenCL device info name gfx1030 (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.) device (driver) version OpenCL 2.0 (3513.0 (HSA1.1,LC)) maximum threads per block 1024 maximum threads per grid 1073741824 number of multiprocessors 30 (1920 compute elements) clock rate 2475 MHz Automatic parameters threads per grid 0 optimizing kernels for RDNA Loading binary kernel file mfakto_Kernels.elf Compiling kernels. GPUSievePrimes (adjusted) 82486 GPUsieve minimum exponent 1055144 ######### test case 1/34071 (M67094119[81-82]) ######### Starting trial factoring M67094119 from 2^81 to 2^82 (7299.20 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:49 | 1272 0.1% | 0.008 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M67094119 has a factor: 2623030050785206718821057 (81.117509 bits, 857.719011 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M67094119 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett15_83_gs_2] self-test for M67094119 passed (cl_barrett15_83_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.008s ######### test case 2/34071 (M45448679[81-82]) ######### Starting trial factoring M45448679 from 2^81 to 2^82 (10775.53 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:49 | 700 0.1% | 0.007 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M45448679 has a factor: 2758834464316013172866561 (81.190333 bits, 2050.940260 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M45448679 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett15_83_gs_2] self-test for M45448679 passed (cl_barrett15_83_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.007s ######### test case 3/34071 (M30568231[81-82]) ######### Starting trial factoring M30568231 from 2^81 to 2^82 (16020.99 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:49 | 1580 0.1% | 0.007 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M30568231 has a factor: 3696288395636373937390841 (81.612352 bits, 9810.481914 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M30568231 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett15_83_gs_2] self-test for M30568231 passed (cl_barrett15_83_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.007s ######### test case 4/34071 (M71065531[81-82]) ######### Starting trial factoring M71065531 from 2^81 to 2^82 (6891.29 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:49 | 4116 0.1% | 0.007 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M71065531 has a factor: 4702493985254889387181633 (81.959700 bits, 6613.577532 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M71065531 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett15_83_gs_2] self-test for M71065531 passed (cl_barrett15_83_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.007s ######### test case 5/34071 (M72067427[82-83]) ######### Starting trial factoring M72067427 from 2^82 to 2^83 (13590.98 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:49 | 4348 0.1% | 0.007 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M72067427 has a factor: 6741341188542680773988393 (82.479310 bits, 6514.291481 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M72067427 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_87_gs_2] self-test for M72067427 passed (cl_barrett32_87_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.007s ######### test case 6/34071 (M52031087[82-83]) #########

Skip Da Shu
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 23
Posts: 25
Credit: 70,495,902
RAC: 87,393
Message 9803 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 21:52:56 UTC - in response to Message 9792.
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024, 22:08:29 UTC

Here's the bottom of test.log:

######### test case 34070/34071 (M332196671[91-92]) ######### Starting trial factoring M332196671 from 2^91 to 2^92 (1509608.98 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:50 | 484 0.1% | 0.009 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M332196671 has a factor: 3466064070766392947648319689 (91.485357 bits, 732699.112106 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M332196671 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2] self-test for M332196671 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.009s ######### test case 34071/34071 (M112404491[91-92]) ######### Starting trial factoring M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 (4461450.54 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:50 | 1848 0.1% | 0.009 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M112404491 has a factor: 3941616367695054034124905537 (91.670846 bits, 2992945.937358 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2] self-test for M112404491 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.009s Self-test statistics number of tests 34026 successful tests 34026 self-test PASSED!


So, Do I have a wrapper problem?

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9804 - Posted: 21 Mar 2024, 22:31:52 UTC - in response to Message 9803.

Here's the bottom of test.log:

######### test case 34070/34071 (M332196671[91-92]) ######### Starting trial factoring M332196671 from 2^91 to 2^92 (1509608.98 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:50 | 484 0.1% | 0.009 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M332196671 has a factor: 3466064070766392947648319689 (91.485357 bits, 732699.112106 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M332196671 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2] self-test for M332196671 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.009s ######### test case 34071/34071 (M112404491[91-92]) ######### Starting trial factoring M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 (4461450.54 GHz-days) Date Time | class Pct | time ETA | GHz-d/day Sieve Wait Mar 21 16:50 | 1848 0.1% | 0.009 n.a. | n.a. 82486 0.00% M112404491 has a factor: 3941616367695054034124905537 (91.670846 bits, 2992945.937358 GHz-d) found 1 factor for M112404491 from 2^91 to 2^92 [mfakto 0.15pre8 cl_barrett32_92_gs_2] self-test for M112404491 passed (cl_barrett32_92_gs)! tf(): total time spent: 0.009s Self-test statistics number of tests 34026 successful tests 34026 self-test PASSED!


So, Do I have a wrapper problem?


We can test with wrapper in a job.xml file, without it looks fine.

Skip Da Shu
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 23
Posts: 25
Credit: 70,495,902
RAC: 87,393
Message 9805 - Posted: 22 Mar 2024, 2:13:47 UTC - in response to Message 9804.
Last modified: 22 Mar 2024, 2:17:44 UTC

Yes, but end results still the same:

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=146304058

Let me know what I need to do next.

Thanx, Skip

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9807 - Posted: 22 Mar 2024, 16:36:55 UTC - in response to Message 9805.
Last modified: 22 Mar 2024, 16:42:20 UTC

Yes, but end results still the same:

https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=146304058

Let me know what I need to do next.

Thanx, Skip


I have created a short wrappertest

1. extract the zip. file
2. start only the wrapper file wrapper_26018_linux-u18_x86-64 outside boinc
3. check the results file

Magiceye04
Send message
Joined: 22 Apr 21
Posts: 15
Credit: 24,706,592
RAC: 1,934
Message 9808 - Posted: 22 Mar 2024, 19:13:13 UTC

This is what I get as user:

2024-03-22 20:16:29 (475150): Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode
2024-03-22 20:16:29 (475150): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-22 20:16:29 (475150): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 (-d 1)
2024-03-22 20:16:29 (475150): wrapper: created child process 475154
execv() failed: : Permission denied
2024-03-22 20:16:30 (475150): ./mfakto-x64 exited; CPU time 0.000283
2024-03-22 20:16:30 (475150): app exit status: 0x6c
2024-03-22 20:16:30 (475150): called boinc_finish(195)

and this as su:

2024-03-22 20:12:54 (474696): Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode
2024-03-22 20:12:54 (474696): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
2024-03-22 20:12:54 (474696): wrapper: running ./mfakto-x64 (-d 1)
2024-03-22 20:12:54 (474696): wrapper: created child process 474698
Error -33 (Invalid device): clGetContextInfo(CL_DEVICE_NAME)
2024-03-22 20:12:55 (474696): ./mfakto-x64 exited; CPU time 0.017179
2024-03-22 20:12:55 (474696): app exit status: 0x2
2024-03-22 20:12:55 (474696): called boinc_finish(195

there is also something in the terminal:

2024-03-22 20:12:54 (474696): wrapper (7.24.26018): starting
mfakto 0.15pre8 (64-bit build)


Runtime options
INI file mfakto.ini
Verbosity 1
SieveOnGPU yes
MoreClasses yes
GPUSievePrimes 82486
GPUSieveProcessSize 24 Kib
GPUSieveSize 96 Mib
FlushInterval 8
WorkFile worktodo.txt
ResultsFile results.txt
Checkpoints enabled
CheckpointDelay 60 s
Stages enabled
StopAfterFactor class
PrintMode compact
V5UserID none
ComputerID none
TimeStampInResults no
VectorSize 2
GPUType AUTO
SmallExp no
UseBinfile mfakto_Kernels.elf
Compile-time options

Select device - Get device info:
ERROR: init_CL(3, 1) failed

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7479
Credit: 43,656,217
RAC: 40,614
Message 9809 - Posted: 22 Mar 2024, 19:23:07 UTC - in response to Message 9808.
Last modified: 22 Mar 2024, 20:16:33 UTC

ok, set the execute permissions to the wrapper file and change in job.xml -d 1 to -device 0


update:
I have fixed the zip file, nothing need to be changed.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Linux TF WUs on ATI 6800 cards


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2014-2024 BOINC Confederation / rebirther