OSX test WUs are available

Author	Message
rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 156 - Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 18:34:18 UTC
Pls attach some MACs as soon as possible for testing both apps 32/64bit. -Reb
ID: 156 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Steve Hawker* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 14 Posts: 26 Credit: 610,307 RAC: 0	Message 157 - Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 18:44:11 UTC - in response to Message 156.
I just get this: Fri Dec 12 10:41:25 2014 \| SRBase \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found I tried resetting and re-attaching, no joy. [64bit OSX]
ID: 157 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 161 - Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 19:17:59 UTC - in response to Message 157.
I just get this: Fri Dec 12 10:41:25 2014 \| SRBase \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found I tried resetting and re-attaching, no joy. [64bit OSX] The second scheduler connection should get an access. I have updated both OSX now.
ID: 161 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Steve Hawker* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 14 Posts: 26 Credit: 610,307 RAC: 0	Message 162 - Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 19:46:49 UTC - in response to Message 161.
Sorry... Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 \| SRBase \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found Do I need to do reset the project?
ID: 162 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 163 - Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 20:09:30 UTC - in response to Message 162.
Sorry... Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 \| SRBase \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found Do I need to do reset the project? No.
ID: 163 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 171 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 7:44:15 UTC
The residues for OSX, win32/64 and linux32/64 matched in all results, thats a good sign.
ID: 171 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,166,007,944 RAC: 399,195	Message 182 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 21:21:59 UTC Last modified: 13 Dec 2014, 21:23:10 UTC
I am running three OS X machines, all errors so far. I will suspend them for now. Let me know when to try again. Here is a sample: http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=72452 Stderr output <core_client_version>7.4.33</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G) </message> <stderr_txt> 12:43:51 (39815): wrapper (7.5.26012): starting 12:43:51 (39815): wrapper: running ./llr64mac ( -d -oPgenInputFile=input.prp -oPgenOutputFile=primes.txt -oDiskWriteTime=10 -oOutputIterations=10000 -oResultsFileIterations=99999999) </stderr_txt> ]]> ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA
ID: 182 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>Le_Pommier] Aillas Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 10 Credit: 10,531,968 RAC: 0	Message 183 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 21:52:55 UTC
Everything ok for me (64 bit) ____________ Badge Score: 83 + 14 = 28
ID: 183 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,166,007,944 RAC: 399,195	Message 184 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 22:11:46 UTC - in response to Message 183.
Everything ok for me (64 bit) That is because your tasks are finishing in under 240 seconds. It appears that the tasks self-abort after hitting 240 seconds of run time. exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G) ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA
ID: 184 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 185 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 22:22:00 UTC - in response to Message 184. Last modified: 13 Dec 2014, 22:26:18 UTC
Everything ok for me (64 bit) That is because your tasks are finishing in under 240 seconds. It appears that the tasks self-abort after hitting 240 seconds of run time. exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G) Yes its a bit mysterious, the settings in template are: <rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> <rsc_fpops_est>8.2548e10</rsc_fpops_est> This should be enough time to finish a WU. Perhaps the server software is ignoring the settings somewhow or has something todo with credit new in background? I need more time to investigate whats wrong, the app should be ok. If you can calculated your values with <rsc_fpops_bound> / <flops> * <duration_correction_factor> this could be help me a bit.
ID: 185 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,166,007,944 RAC: 399,195	Message 186 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:01:13 UTC - in response to Message 185. Last modified: 13 Dec 2014, 23:03:49 UTC
Sure. Just tell me where to get the values? 3129 12/13/2014 3:00:10 PM Running CPU benchmarks 3130 12/13/2014 3:00:11 PM Suspending computation - CPU benchmarks in progress 3131 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Benchmark results: 3132 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Number of CPUs: 8 3133 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 5278 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3134 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 13598 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA
ID: 186 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 187 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:06:55 UTC - in response to Message 186.
Sure. Just tell me where to get the values? 3129 12/13/2014 3:00:10 PM Running CPU benchmarks 3130 12/13/2014 3:00:11 PM Suspending computation - CPU benchmarks in progress 3131 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Benchmark results: 3132 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Number of CPUs: 8 3133 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 5278 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3134 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 13598 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU FLOPS = floating points + integer. Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the 8.2548e14 to a much higher level e30? I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing.
ID: 187 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,166,007,944 RAC: 399,195	Message 188 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:21:59 UTC - in response to Message 187.
Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the <rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> to a much higher level e30? I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing. I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd! ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA
ID: 188 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Steve Hawker* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 14 Posts: 26 Credit: 610,307 RAC: 0	Message 189 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:23:03 UTC - in response to Message 163.
Sorry... Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 \| SRBase \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found Do I need to do reset the project? No. I just tried to get work and still got the HTTP file not found So I reattached and now I'm getting work. W00t!!
ID: 189 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7457 Credit: 42,792,827 RAC: 5,432	Message 190 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:25:41 UTC - in response to Message 188.
Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the 8.2548e14 to a much higher level e30? I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing. I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd! In the next batch I will raise the limits. This could help.
ID: 190 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,166,007,944 RAC: 399,195	Message 191 - Posted: 13 Dec 2014, 23:27:11 UTC
Please let us know when that happens. I will put my machines on NNT until the so I don't just burn up tasks. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA
ID: 191 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Steve Hawker* Send message Joined: 8 Dec 14 Posts: 26 Credit: 610,307 RAC: 0	Message 192 - Posted: 14 Dec 2014, 0:28:03 UTC - in response to Message 190. Last modified: 14 Dec 2014, 0:30:08 UTC
Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the <rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> to a much higher level e30? I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing. I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd! In the next batch I will raise the limits. This could help. I found rsc_fpops_bound and edited it to 8254800000000000000000000.000000 {I added 10 zeroes} I unsuspended a WU and it finished without any problem. So it did help to edit this parameter Here's the task: http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=81082 You'll probably already know this but the tasks have an estimated duration of 0:00 and go to 100% immediately. I guess some other parameters need adjustment too.
ID: 192 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Author

Message

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

500k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

Pls attach some MACs as soon as possible for testing both apps 32/64bit.

-Reb

ID: 156 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

Steve Hawker*
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 14
Posts: 26
Credit: 610,307
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

100k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

100k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

I just get this:

Fri Dec 12 10:41:25 2014 | SRBase | Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found

I tried resetting and re-attaching, no joy.

[64bit OSX]

ID: 157 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

I just get this:

Fri Dec 12 10:41:25 2014 | SRBase | Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found

I tried resetting and re-attaching, no joy.

[64bit OSX]

The second scheduler connection should get an access.

I have updated both OSX now.

ID: 161 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

Steve Hawker*
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 14
Posts: 26
Credit: 610,307
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Sorry...

Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 | SRBase | Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found

Do I need to do reset the project?

ID: 162 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Sorry...

Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 | SRBase | Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found

Do I need to do reset the project?

No.

ID: 163 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

The residues for OSX, win32/64 and linux32/64 matched in all results, thats a good sign.

ID: 171 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,166,007,944
RAC: 399,195
5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

10M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - long credit

5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

I am running three OS X machines, all errors so far. I will suspend them for now. Let me know when to try again.

Here is a sample:

http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=72452

Stderr output

<core_client_version>7.4.33</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
12:43:51 (39815): wrapper (7.5.26012): starting
12:43:51 (39815): wrapper: running ./llr64mac ( -d -oPgenInputFile=input.prp -oPgenOutputFile=primes.txt -oDiskWriteTime=10 -oOutputIterations=10000 -oResultsFileIterations=99999999)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

____________
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA

ID: 182 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

[AF>Le_Pommier] Aillas
Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 10
Credit: 10,531,968
RAC: 0
1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - short credit

1M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base - average credit

Everything ok for me (64 bit)
____________

Badge Score: 8*3 + 1*4 = 28

ID: 183 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,166,007,944
RAC: 399,195
5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Everything ok for me (64 bit)

That is because your tasks are finishing in under 240 seconds. It appears that the tasks self-abort after hitting 240 seconds of run time.

exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G)

____________
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA

ID: 184 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Everything ok for me (64 bit)

That is because your tasks are finishing in under 240 seconds. It appears that the tasks self-abort after hitting 240 seconds of run time.

exceeded elapsed time limit 240.08 (825480.00G/3438.33G)

Yes its a bit mysterious, the settings in template are:

<rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> <rsc_fpops_est>8.2548e10</rsc_fpops_est>

This should be enough time to finish a WU. Perhaps the server software is ignoring the settings somewhow or has something todo with credit new in background? I need more time to investigate whats wrong, the app should be ok.

If you can calculated your values with

<rsc_fpops_bound> / <flops> * <duration_correction_factor>

this could be help me a bit.

ID: 185 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,166,007,944
RAC: 399,195
5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Sure. Just tell me where to get the values?

3129 12/13/2014 3:00:10 PM Running CPU benchmarks 3130 12/13/2014 3:00:11 PM Suspending computation - CPU benchmarks in progress 3131 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Benchmark results: 3132 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Number of CPUs: 8 3133 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 5278 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3134 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 13598 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

____________
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA

ID: 186 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Sure. Just tell me where to get the values?

3129 12/13/2014 3:00:10 PM Running CPU benchmarks 3130 12/13/2014 3:00:11 PM Suspending computation - CPU benchmarks in progress 3131 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Benchmark results: 3132 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM Number of CPUs: 8 3133 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 5278 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3134 12/13/2014 3:00:42 PM 13598 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

FLOPS = floating points + integer.

Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the 8.2548e14 to a much higher level e30?

I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing.

ID: 187 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,166,007,944
RAC: 399,195
5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the <rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> to a much higher level e30?

I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing.

I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd!
____________
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA

ID: 188 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

Steve Hawker*
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 14
Posts: 26
Credit: 610,307
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Sorry...

Fri Dec 12 11:46:25 2014 | SRBase | Scheduler request failed: HTTP file not found

Do I need to do reset the project?

No.

I just tried to get work and still got the HTTP file not found

So I reattached and now I'm getting work. W00t!!

ID: 189 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 7457
Credit: 42,792,827
RAC: 5,432
2M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the 8.2548e14 to a much higher level e30?

I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing.

I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd!

In the next batch I will raise the limits. This could help.

ID: 190 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,166,007,944
RAC: 399,195
5M in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Please let us know when that happens. I will put my machines on NNT until the so I don't just burn up tasks.
____________
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA

ID: 191 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote

Steve Hawker*
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 14
Posts: 26
Credit: 610,307
RAC: 0
10k in Sierpinski / Riesel Base credit

Can you try to edit your client_state.xml and change the <rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_bound> to a much higher level e30?

I think the limit was not enough. Just for testing.

I could not find "rsc_fpops_bound" in the client_state.xml for any srbase tasks. In fact, I see no sorbs tasks at all. I see all the tasks for all the other projects that are downloaded to my machine. Andy I see their rsc_fpops_bound values. Very odd!

In the next batch I will raise the limits. This could help.

I found rsc_fpops_bound and edited it to 8254800000000000000000000.000000 {I added 10 zeroes}

I unsuspended a WU and it finished without any problem. So it did help to edit this parameter

Here's the task: http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=81082

You'll probably already know this but the tasks have an estimated duration of 0:00 and go to 100% immediately. I guess some other parameters need adjustment too.

ID: 192 · Rating: 0 · rate:

Reply Quote