rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8007
Credit: 46,538,964
RAC: 0
The first part of the base R842 was created.
-n=25-50k
-runtime around 24s-5min
-2 credits per WU
-Reb
/ 
Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8007
Credit: 46,538,964
RAC: 0
Current status:
186*842^33489-1 found by Conan
71*842^33982-1 found by JayPi
17*842^35640-1 found by JayPi
170*842^46660-1 found by Cruncher Pete [BlackOpsTeam]
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8007
Credit: 46,538,964
RAC: 0
The second part of the base R842 was created.
-n=50-75k
-runtime around 2-7min
-9 credits per WU
/ Reply
Quote
rebirtherVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8007
Credit: 46,538,964
RAC: 0
The last batch was loaded.
- n=75-100k
- runtime around 5-7min (AVX @4Ghz)
- 11 credits per WU
I have also increased
<rsc_fpops_bound>8.2548e25</rsc_fpops_bound>
<rsc_fpops_est>8.2548e14</rsc_fpops_est>
Lets hope the exceeded time errors are gone now.
Update:
I need to tweak the second value in the next test, is too high.
Update2:
I have made an update on the db fields to reduce the estimated time.
/ Reply
Quote