New tests for linux soon (started)
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : New tests for linux soon (started)

Author Message
Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 241 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 10:06:58 UTC

The internal test of the linux64 was successful. The zip compression of the llr app has still the execute bit so I dont need the copy_file tag anymore. The text file busy error could be fixed now but need some tests first for linux32 and linux64. If all is going well and the OSX app has the same issue I will change it too.

DeleteNull
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 14
Posts: 24
Credit: 2,531,637
RAC: 0
Message 242 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 10:58:31 UTC - in response to Message 241.

Linux32 seems to be o.k. http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=485

But the tasks are very short?! Perhaps we can test runtimes about 60 [s]?

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 243 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:04:51 UTC - in response to Message 242.

Linux32 seems to be o.k. http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=485

But the tasks are very short?! Perhaps we can test runtimes about 60 [s]?


There is no difference in runtime. I dont want to waste much time ;)

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 14
Posts: 16
Credit: 776,321
RAC: 5
Message 244 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:05:29 UTC

Linux 64 also seems to run good, example http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=680381
First thought it won't because of the short runtime but they validated.
____________
2126*396^65889+1 and 7218*991^50722-1 are my Primes!
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
My BOINC-Stats

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 245 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:09:30 UTC - in response to Message 244.

Linux 64 also seems to run good, example http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=680381
First thought it won't because of the short runtime but they validated.


Sounds good, so one of the most error is gone now and I can run linux32 app too.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 248 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 13:29:36 UTC

800 of 800 results are back with success.

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 14
Posts: 16
Credit: 776,321
RAC: 5
Message 257 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 18:50:32 UTC

Hm, progress behaviour of the Linux tasks is a bit odd in comparison to the Windoze ones:
They went quite fast to 99%, after some minutes they were already at 100%, but they are still crunching over an hour now at 100% - range 150-175 as far as I see from the wu-name. Looks like they take longer than the same wus on Windows.
____________
2126*396^65889+1 and 7218*991^50722-1 are my Primes!
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
My BOINC-Stats

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 258 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:04:11 UTC - in response to Message 257.

Hm, progress behaviour of the Linux tasks is a bit odd in comparison to the Windoze ones:
They went quite fast to 99%, after some minutes they were already at 100%, but they are still crunching over an hour now at 100% - range 150-175 as far as I see from the wu-name. Looks like they take longer than the same wus on Windows.


This is normal. The estimated time will take some time to catchup. We have small and longer WUs. You can read it in the news how long they will taking.

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 14
Posts: 16
Credit: 776,321
RAC: 5
Message 259 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:14:28 UTC - in response to Message 258.

Yeah, I know. Since I don't have AVX machines it takes longer anyway.
I did not look at the estimates, but because the tasks were so fast at 100% the remaining time disappeared anayway.
____________
2126*396^65889+1 and 7218*991^50722-1 are my Primes!
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
My BOINC-Stats

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 14
Posts: 16
Credit: 776,321
RAC: 5
Message 261 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:53:52 UTC
Last modified: 23 Dec 2014, 19:54:14 UTC

Tasks are finished now but as I wanted to take a look what primes they were I only see a short version of the output and no prime at all - the Windows outputs are quite longer with more information.
Example: 686362
Is that intended? At least they validated...
____________
2126*396^65889+1 and 7218*991^50722-1 are my Primes!
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
My BOINC-Stats

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 262 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:03:44 UTC - in response to Message 261.

Tasks are finished now but as I wanted to take a look what primes they were I only see a short version of the output and no prime at all - the Windows outputs are quite longer with more information.
Example: 686362
Is that intended? At least they validated...


Only the linux app has no output in stderr.txt and I cant explain me why but the results are there.

Profile DoctorNow
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 14
Posts: 16
Credit: 776,321
RAC: 5
Message 263 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:12:44 UTC - in response to Message 262.

Ok, too bad...
____________
2126*396^65889+1 and 7218*991^50722-1 are my Primes!
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
My BOINC-Stats

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 3222
Credit: 22,879,153
RAC: 10
Message 264 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:18:54 UTC - in response to Message 263.

Ok, too bad...


I will ask the developer.


Post to thread

Message boards : News : New tests for linux soon (started)


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2014-2017 BOINC Confederation / rebirther