LL-dc test started

Message boards : News : LL-dc test started

Author	Message
rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11768 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 11:49:24 UTC
	All tests were running successfully, preparing real work...
	ID: 11768 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11769 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 12:44:37 UTC Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:45:34 UTC
	starting batch - max_tasks_in_progress = 1 per GPU - 2d20h on a 5500XT, faster on better GPUs - deadline 5d + 1d grace_period - 85M If your card is slower then disable it in your cc_config.xml The estimated runtime is not sufficient enough in BM, check the 2. ETA HH:MM value in stderr.txt to know the exact runtime.
	ID: 11769 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

entity Send message Joined: 30 Apr 22 Posts: 16 Credit: 358,447,801 RAC: 1,838,520	Message 11770 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:04:20 UTC - in response to Message 11769. Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:08:18 UTC
	Is ETA in HH:MM or MM:SS ? Mine say 17:52. I assume that is 17 hours and 52 minutes. Is that correct? Quite a bit of a reduction after the first step: 20260529 07:47:27 85577477 20000 64c0b326531c9729 751.8 ETA 17:52 20260529 07:47:41 85577477 40000 e53fff176d102ab2 676.5 ETA 16:04 20260529 07:47:54 85577477 60000 6a1f639f97a6f93f 675.8 ETA 16:03
	ID: 11770 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11771 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:32:27 UTC - in response to Message 11770. Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:34:12 UTC
	yes, HH:MM, the 2nd ETA value is correct
	ID: 11771 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11772 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:47:47 UTC
	I have fixed the deadline in 2nd batch from 5-6d, the change was not saved in the first.
	ID: 11772 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11773 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 18:10:04 UTC
	We will add more work soon. GIMPs is fixing the workscript settings and we still optimizing the input template.
	ID: 11773 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Sabroe_SMC Send message Joined: 10 Jan 15 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,038,978,767 RAC: 180,061	Message 11774 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 23:58:18 UTC Last modified: 29 May 2026, 23:59:44 UTC
	Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not? https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866
	ID: 11774 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Speedy51 Send message Joined: 7 Feb 18 Posts: 158 Credit: 942,642,717 RAC: 459,541	Message 11775 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 0:30:53 UTC - in response to Message 11774.
	Currently the average runtime is 9.61 hours https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/server_status.php
	ID: 11775 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

entity Send message Joined: 30 Apr 22 Posts: 16 Credit: 358,447,801 RAC: 1,838,520	Message 11776 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 2:38:05 UTC - in response to Message 11774.
	Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not? https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866 Boinc Manager is not displaying the correct status. To get a close ETA go to the slots folder and browse the stderr.txt file. At the bottom of the file will be the ETA at the moment you browsed the file.
	ID: 11776 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

esek Send message Joined: 24 Dec 22 Posts: 1 Credit: 79,475,224 RAC: 519,739	Message 11777 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 5:14:46 UTC
	On systems equipped with both Intel Arc and NVIDIA GPUs, prpll fails to execute on the correct device. It defaults to running on the first available device—unless manually specified via the command line, which is not feasible within BOINC. Intel Arc GPU is ill-suited for running prpll, which results in crashes. Given the significant architectural differences between Intel Arc, AMD, and NVIDIA GPUs, the original version of prpll cannot operate on the B580 platform with reasonable speed or reliability. A potential solution may involve compiling platform-specific versions of prpll—each tailored to run exclusively on a particular GPU brand—and distributing them based on user preferences. Device selection : use one of -uid <UID>, -pci <BDF>, -device <N>, see the list below N : PCI BDF \| UID \| Driver \| Device 0 : \| \| 32.0.101.8824 \| Intel(R) Arc(TM) B580 Graphics \| 1 : 14:00.0 \| \| 3652.0 (PAL,LC) \| gfx1036 \| AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics 2 : \| \| 610.47 \| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 \| 3 : \| \| 2026.20.1.0.12_160000 \| AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor \|
	ID: 11777 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Beyond Send message Joined: 7 Apr 17 Posts: 7 Credit: 132,981,729 RAC: 3,356,721	Message 11778 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 21:04:30 UTC - in response to Message 11776.
	Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not? https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866 Boinc Manager is not displaying the correct status. To get a close ETA go to the slots folder and browse the stderr.txt file. At the bottom of the file will be the ETA at the moment you browsed the file. Yikes, by the stderr.txt my RX6600 has another 1 day and 14 hours.
	ID: 11778 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

entity Send message Joined: 30 Apr 22 Posts: 16 Credit: 358,447,801 RAC: 1,838,520	Message 11780 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 14:28:37 UTC - in response to Message 11778.
	Is there an estimate on when new work will be available for LL-dc?
	ID: 11780 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11781 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 14:35:01 UTC - in response to Message 11780. Last modified: 31 May 2026, 15:47:25 UTC
	Is there an estimate on when new work will be available for LL-dc? There is a bigger issue on the workscript which they are working on, last status 1-2d+- update: they found the issue and fixed it.
	ID: 11781 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

FritzB Send message Joined: 12 Apr 18 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,050,709,147 RAC: 179,225	Message 11782 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 19:22:23 UTC Last modified: 31 May 2026, 19:23:28 UTC
	I'm experiencing the same problems as in Moo! The OpenCL AMD WUs are being processed exclusively on the Nvidia card in my mixed ATI/Nvidia system. This includes the ATI-labeled WU! https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=226930 Edit: Even if I pause the NV-WU.
	ID: 11782 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11783 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 19:43:52 UTC - in response to Message 11782.
	Which device is in your stderr.txt for AMD GPU?
	ID: 11783 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

FritzB Send message Joined: 12 Apr 18 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,050,709,147 RAC: 179,225	Message 11784 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 20:02:55 UTC - in response to Message 11783.
	The RTX 5070 Ti.
	ID: 11784 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 8486 Credit: 187,852,813 RAC: 74	Message 11785 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 21:04:09 UTC
	Do you have the same issue with TF app?
	ID: 11785 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Peter Ingham Send message Joined: 15 Apr 26 Posts: 1 Credit: 60,695,550 RAC: 281,909	Message 11786 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 0:42:23 UTC
	The Remaining time to complete displayed in Boinc for the LL tasks seems to be increasing at a geometric rate. NV4070
	ID: 11786 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

tito Send message Joined: 30 Dec 14 Posts: 20 Credit: 1,200,033,063 RAC: 1,695,209	Message 11787 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 4:06:28 UTC - in response to Message 11786.
	That WU https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=55773173 It's reported it was claculated in 15085 sec, but according my observations nad WU-prop it was more that 18hrs
	ID: 11787 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

FritzB Send message Joined: 12 Apr 18 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,050,709,147 RAC: 179,225	Message 11788 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 5:40:44 UTC - in response to Message 11785.
	No, at TF it's working fine. For LL-dc@ATI the stderr.txt now only says: 2026-06-01 07:34:52 (4768): wrapper: running prpll.exe (-d 0 -v -use NO_ASM) 2026-06-01 07:34:52 (4768): wrapper: created child process 8580
	ID: 11788 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Post to thread

Message boards : News : LL-dc test started