LL-dc test started
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : LL-dc test started

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author Message
Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11768 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 11:49:24 UTC

All tests were running successfully, preparing real work...

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11769 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 12:44:37 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:45:34 UTC

starting batch

- max_tasks_in_progress = 1 per GPU
- 2d20h on a 5500XT, faster on better GPUs
- deadline 5d + 1d grace_period
- 85M

If your card is slower then disable it in your cc_config.xml

The estimated runtime is not sufficient enough in BM, check the 2. ETA HH:MM value in stderr.txt to know the exact runtime.

entity
Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 22
Posts: 16
Credit: 358,431,301
RAC: 1,845,644
Message 11770 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:04:20 UTC - in response to Message 11769.
Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:08:18 UTC

Is ETA in HH:MM or MM:SS ?

Mine say 17:52. I assume that is 17 hours and 52 minutes. Is that correct?

Quite a bit of a reduction after the first step:

20260529 07:47:27 85577477 20000 64c0b326531c9729 751.8 ETA 17:52
20260529 07:47:41 85577477 40000 e53fff176d102ab2 676.5 ETA 16:04
20260529 07:47:54 85577477 60000 6a1f639f97a6f93f 675.8 ETA 16:03

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11771 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:32:27 UTC - in response to Message 11770.
Last modified: 29 May 2026, 13:34:12 UTC

yes, HH:MM, the 2nd ETA value is correct

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11772 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 13:47:47 UTC

I have fixed the deadline in 2nd batch from 5-6d, the change was not saved in the first.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11773 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 18:10:04 UTC

We will add more work soon. GIMPs is fixing the workscript settings and we still optimizing the input template.

Profile Sabroe_SMC
Send message
Joined: 10 Jan 15
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,038,978,767
RAC: 180,061
Message 11774 - Posted: 29 May 2026, 23:58:18 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2026, 23:59:44 UTC

Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not?
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866

Speedy51
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 18
Posts: 158
Credit: 942,372,717
RAC: 435,234
Message 11775 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 0:30:53 UTC - in response to Message 11774.

Currently the average runtime is 9.61 hours https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/server_status.php

entity
Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 22
Posts: 16
Credit: 358,431,301
RAC: 1,845,644
Message 11776 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 2:38:05 UTC - in response to Message 11774.

Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not?
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866

Boinc Manager is not displaying the correct status. To get a close ETA go to the slots folder and browse the stderr.txt file. At the bottom of the file will be the ETA at the moment you browsed the file.

esek
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 24 Dec 22
Posts: 1
Credit: 79,115,224
RAC: 487,163
Message 11777 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 5:14:46 UTC

On systems equipped with both Intel Arc and NVIDIA GPUs, prpll fails to execute on the correct device. It defaults to running on the first available device—unless manually specified via the command line, which is not feasible within BOINC.
Intel Arc GPU is ill-suited for running prpll, which results in crashes. Given the significant architectural differences between Intel Arc, AMD, and NVIDIA GPUs, the original version of prpll cannot operate on the B580 platform with reasonable speed or reliability.
A potential solution may involve compiling platform-specific versions of prpll—each tailored to run exclusively on a particular GPU brand—and distributing them based on user preferences.

Device selection : use one of -uid <UID>, -pci <BDF>, -device <N>, see the list below

N : PCI BDF | UID | Driver | Device
0 : | | 32.0.101.8824 | Intel(R) Arc(TM) B580 Graphics |
1 : 14:00.0 | | 3652.0 (PAL,LC) | gfx1036 | AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics
2 : | | 610.47 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
3 : | | 2026.20.1.0.12_160000 | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor |

Profile Beyond
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 7 Apr 17
Posts: 7
Credit: 131,621,729
RAC: 3,391,606
Message 11778 - Posted: 30 May 2026, 21:04:30 UTC - in response to Message 11776.

Hmmm, my Wu is now running for more then 4 Hours on a RTX5080.And its at 100%. Is this correct or not?
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=216866

Boinc Manager is not displaying the correct status. To get a close ETA go to the slots folder and browse the stderr.txt file. At the bottom of the file will be the ETA at the moment you browsed the file.

Yikes, by the stderr.txt my RX6600 has another 1 day and 14 hours.

entity
Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 22
Posts: 16
Credit: 358,431,301
RAC: 1,845,644
Message 11780 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 14:28:37 UTC - in response to Message 11778.

Is there an estimate on when new work will be available for LL-dc?

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11781 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 14:35:01 UTC - in response to Message 11780.
Last modified: 31 May 2026, 15:47:25 UTC

Is there an estimate on when new work will be available for LL-dc?


There is a bigger issue on the workscript which they are working on, last status 1-2d+-

update:
they found the issue and fixed it.

FritzB
Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 18
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,050,709,147
RAC: 179,225
Message 11782 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 19:22:23 UTC
Last modified: 31 May 2026, 19:23:28 UTC

I'm experiencing the same problems as in Moo! The OpenCL AMD WUs are being processed exclusively on the Nvidia card in my mixed ATI/Nvidia system. This includes the ATI-labeled WU!
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/show_host_detail.php?hostid=226930

Edit: Even if I pause the NV-WU.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11783 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 19:43:52 UTC - in response to Message 11782.

Which device is in your stderr.txt for AMD GPU?

FritzB
Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 18
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,050,709,147
RAC: 179,225
Message 11784 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 20:02:55 UTC - in response to Message 11783.

The RTX 5070 Ti.

Profile rebirther
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 13
Posts: 8486
Credit: 187,852,813
RAC: 74
Message 11785 - Posted: 31 May 2026, 21:04:09 UTC

Do you have the same issue with TF app?

Peter Ingham
Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 26
Posts: 1
Credit: 60,695,550
RAC: 281,909
Message 11786 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 0:42:23 UTC

The Remaining time to complete displayed in Boinc for the LL tasks seems to be increasing at a geometric rate.

NV4070

tito
Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 14
Posts: 20
Credit: 1,199,943,063
RAC: 1,695,595
Message 11787 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 4:06:28 UTC - in response to Message 11786.

That WU
https://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=55773173
It's reported it was claculated in 15085 sec, but according my observations nad WU-prop it was more that 18hrs

FritzB
Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 18
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,050,709,147
RAC: 179,225
Message 11788 - Posted: 1 Jun 2026, 5:40:44 UTC - in response to Message 11785.

No, at TF it's working fine.

For LL-dc@ATI the stderr.txt now only says:

2026-06-01 07:34:52 (4768): wrapper: running prpll.exe (-d 0 -v -use NO_ASM)
2026-06-01 07:34:52 (4768): wrapper: created child process 8580

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Post to thread

Message boards : News : LL-dc test started


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2014-2026 BOINC Confederation / rebirther