New tests for linux soon (started)

Message boards : News : New tests for linux soon (started)

Author	Message
rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 241 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 10:06:58 UTC
	The internal test of the linux64 was successful. The zip compression of the llr app has still the execute bit so I dont need the copy_file tag anymore. The text file busy error could be fixed now but need some tests first for linux32 and linux64. If all is going well and the OSX app has the same issue I will change it too.
	ID: 241 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DeleteNull Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Nov 14 Posts: 83 Credit: 374,914,522 RAC: 12,585	Message 242 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 10:58:31 UTC - in response to Message 241.
	Linux32 seems to be o.k. http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=485 But the tasks are very short?! Perhaps we can test runtimes about 60 [s]?
	ID: 242 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 243 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:04:51 UTC - in response to Message 242.
	Linux32 seems to be o.k. http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/results.php?hostid=485 But the tasks are very short?! Perhaps we can test runtimes about 60 [s]? There is no difference in runtime. I dont want to waste much time ;)
	ID: 243 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 28 Nov 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,421,084 RAC: 0	Message 244 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:05:29 UTC
	Linux 64 also seems to run good, example http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=680381 First thought it won't because of the short runtime but they validated. ____________ *2126396^65889+1 and 7218991^50722-1* are my Primes! Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats
	ID: 244 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 245 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 11:09:30 UTC - in response to Message 244.
	Linux 64 also seems to run good, example http://srbase.myfirewall.org/sr5/result.php?resultid=680381 First thought it won't because of the short runtime but they validated. Sounds good, so one of the most error is gone now and I can run linux32 app too.
	ID: 245 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 248 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 13:29:36 UTC
	800 of 800 results are back with success.
	ID: 248 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 28 Nov 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,421,084 RAC: 0	Message 257 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 18:50:32 UTC
	Hm, progress behaviour of the Linux tasks is a bit odd in comparison to the Windoze ones: They went quite fast to 99%, after some minutes they were already at 100%, but they are still crunching over an hour now at 100% - range 150-175 as far as I see from the wu-name. Looks like they take longer than the same wus on Windows. ____________ *2126396^65889+1 and 7218991^50722-1* are my Primes! Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats
	ID: 257 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 258 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:04:11 UTC - in response to Message 257.
	Hm, progress behaviour of the Linux tasks is a bit odd in comparison to the Windoze ones: They went quite fast to 99%, after some minutes they were already at 100%, but they are still crunching over an hour now at 100% - range 150-175 as far as I see from the wu-name. Looks like they take longer than the same wus on Windows. This is normal. The estimated time will take some time to catchup. We have small and longer WUs. You can read it in the news how long they will taking.
	ID: 258 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 28 Nov 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,421,084 RAC: 0	Message 259 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:14:28 UTC - in response to Message 258.
	Yeah, I know. Since I don't have AVX machines it takes longer anyway. I did not look at the estimates, but because the tasks were so fast at 100% the remaining time disappeared anayway. ____________ *2126396^65889+1 and 7218991^50722-1* are my Primes! Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats
	ID: 259 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 28 Nov 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,421,084 RAC: 0	Message 261 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 19:53:52 UTC Last modified: 23 Dec 2014, 19:54:14 UTC
	Tasks are finished now but as I wanted to take a look what primes they were I only see a short version of the output and no prime at all - the Windows outputs are quite longer with more information. Example: 686362 Is that intended? At least they validated... ____________ *2126396^65889+1 and 7218991^50722-1* are my Primes! Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats
	ID: 261 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 262 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:03:44 UTC - in response to Message 261.
	Tasks are finished now but as I wanted to take a look what primes they were I only see a short version of the output and no prime at all - the Windows outputs are quite longer with more information. Example: 686362 Is that intended? At least they validated... Only the linux app has no output in stderr.txt and I cant explain me why but the results are there.
	ID: 262 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoctorNow Send message Joined: 28 Nov 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,421,084 RAC: 0	Message 263 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:12:44 UTC - in response to Message 262.
	Ok, too bad... ____________ *2126396^65889+1 and 7218991^50722-1* are my Primes! Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats
	ID: 263 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rebirther Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 2 Jan 13 Posts: 7465 Credit: 43,136,157 RAC: 21,630	Message 264 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 20:18:54 UTC - in response to Message 263.
	Ok, too bad... I will ask the developer.
	ID: 264 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : News : New tests for linux soon (started)